Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 434823

Summary:	unaligned access messages from /sbin/loader during install
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Doug Chapman <dchapman>
Component:	libnl	Assignee:	Dan Williams <dcbw>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.2	CC:	astokes, tao
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ia64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-03-27 15:41:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Doug Chapman 2008-02-25 17:50:25 UTC

Description of problem:

During anaconda stage 1 we are seeing unaligned access messages from
/sbin/loader on ia64:

loader(446): unaligned access to 0x600000000015c6c4, ip=0x40000000000e2e80

loader(446): unaligned access to 0x600000000015c6cc, ip=0x40000000000e2ec0


I am working on trying to get more detail as of where this error is actually
being generated.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-runtime-11.1.2.103-1

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. serial console install on ia64
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Doug Chapman 2008-02-25 18:33:39 UTC

Digging a little deeper I see that this is coming from a bit of code statically
linked with libnl.  Moving this to the libnl component, this may be a dup of bug
#434826.

I will continue to dig deeper...

- Doug

Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2008-03-25 15:52:14 UTC

*** Bug 438716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Dan Williams 2008-03-27 15:41:49 UTC

duping since the other bug has better info

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 434826 ***