Description of problem: Module::CoreList-2.13 seems defective. cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437804 Upstream recommends to upgrade to 2.14. Module::CoreList is one of the "dual-lived" perl modules, which would mean we have to alternatives to choose from: a) Reactivate the (currently) retired perl-Module-CoreList package b) To replace the Module::CoreList in Fedora's "perl" package. What would you prefer? I am in favor of a), because it would provide a more flexible solution, which would avoid having to rebuild "perl" (Allowing this option had been one purpose of the perl-package split). Downside: core-perl would be build against an outdated Module::CoreList (2.13). Also, I am not sure if yum can handle this. But I also don't have much of a problem with b) - It would be less flexible and a bit more effort.
I prefer B. It will be in rawhide soon.
(In reply to comment #1) > I prefer B. It will be in rawhide soon. <sigh/> I regret having to say so, but your decision is a "slipped-by" opportunity ;) a) would have been a precedence for a perl-dist package being provided by different src.rpms (old from perl, new from separate package). It would have been an opportunity to demonstrate a better, closer and more flexible coupling of perl to CPAN: "If a core package is too old/broken", replace it with an external one ("dual-lived" in Perl terms). Anyway, you chose your poison ;)