xorg-x11-server-1.4.99.901-15.20080401.fc9 kvm-63-2.fc8 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libGLcore.so (II) Module GLcore: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.99.901, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 1.0 Backtrace: 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x79) [0x80bc2f9] 1: [0x130400] 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so [0x67705c] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so [0x6715da] 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so(GlxExtensionInit+0x162) [0x676932] 5: X(InitExtensions+0x8a) [0x80e545a] 6: X(main+0x2ad) [0x806b1bd] 7: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x41c5d6] 8: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x221) [0x806a771] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting
Created attachment 300005 [details] Full Xorg log
Same with VMWare.
Created attachment 300061 [details] Xorg.0.log for ATI Radeon X800 Also crashes for ATI Radeon X800 on my x86_64 box.
Preliminary test of -16 indicates that it has been fixed for kvm.
*** Bug 440263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 300103 [details] Xorg.0.log x86_64 r5xx radeon I just tried out 1.4.99.901-16.20080401 from Koji on an x86_64 system and it is still crashing. Attached is Xorg.0.log output.
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.4.99.901-16.20080401.fc9.i386 works for me with nVidia Corporation NV34M [GeForce FX Go5200 64M].
I did another test with an x86 box with an NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro] (rev 15) video card and confirmed that -15 failed and -16 worked. I tried reverting the ati driver on the other box (x86_64 r5xx radeon) and that one is still failing.
I did some more testing with the x86_64 machine. I reverted to 1.4.99.901-14.20080314.fc9.x86_64.rpm and things worked. I went back to 1.4.99.901-16.20080401.fc9.x86_64.rpm and things were broken again. I was using the latest (-9) ati driver for both of those tests.
(In reply to comment #9) > I did some more testing with the x86_64 machine. I reverted to > 1.4.99.901-14.20080314.fc9.x86_64.rpm and things worked. I went back to > 1.4.99.901-16.20080401.fc9.x86_64.rpm and things were broken again. > I was using the latest (-9) ati driver for both of those tests. What version of mesa are you using?
I have the following installed on the x86_64 box: mesa-libGL-7.1-0.21.fc9.x86_64 mesa-libGL-devel-7.1-0.21.fc9.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-7.1-0.21.fc9.x86_64 mesa-libGL-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libOSMesa-7.1-0.21.fc9.x86_64 mesa-libGLU-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libGLU-devel-7.1-0.21.fc9.x86_64 On the x86 box (that works) I have the following installed: mesa-libGLU-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libGLU-devel-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libOSMesa-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libGLw-6.5.1-5.fc9.i386 mesa-libGL-devel-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libGL-7.1-0.21.fc9.i386 mesa-libGLw-devel-6.5.1-5.fc9.i386
The backtrace in comment #6 is a different backtrace, which matches the one in bug 440491 (supposedly fixed in -17). So I think this can be closed.
-17 seems to have fixed this and my x86_64 machine is working OK using that version of the server.
-17 fixed the problem for me too.