Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 442404
Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org
Last modified: 2008-05-16 14:04:59 EDT
Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/efreet.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/efreet-0.0.3.042-1.fc9.src.rpm
RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/
An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org intended for
use in Enlightenment DR17 (e17) and other applications using the Enlightenment
Foundation Libraries (EFL). Currently, the following specifications are
o Base Directory
o Desktop Entry
o Icon Theme
Documentation is absent for this release. It's upstream bug that should be fixed in next release. Otherwise RPMLint is silent.
License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list
said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/
I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to
built software against this library.
* Sun May 04 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk <email@example.com> - 0.0.3.042-2
- Fixed missing dependencies for efreet-devel
- Fixed timestamp of source tarball
- Preserve timestamps of installed files
New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/efreet.spec
New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/efreet-0.0.3.042-2.fc9.x86_64/
Built RPMs: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e/9/
pkgconfig Requires missing for -devel.
* rpmlint is almost silent
efreet-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
* follow guidelines
* free software almost MIT, included
* match upstream
* %files section right
* lib rightly packaged
APPROVED, provided you add the pkgconfig dep.
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: efreet
Short Description: An implementation of several specifications from
Branches: F-8 F-9
Cvsextras Commits: yes
Erm, yes approved, that was just what I was going to say too, as I was kinda
asked to review this, Ah well no hard feelings :)
Sorry for race condition =P
There is something a bit strange, what is in stalled in %_datadir and
the installed programs seems to be test programs and not real utilities.
Should they really be installed?
Contacted upstream. Those are indeed unittests, and can be stripped out with no
negative side-effect. Will fix before commiting to cvs
Imported to cvs, built for rawhide. Thanks to everyone!