Bug 444198 - pk-application unusable at 800x480
pk-application unusable at 800x480
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-packagekit (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Robin Norwood
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: 467424 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-04-25 15:20 EDT by Jeremy Katz
Modified: 2008-10-27 09:09 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-10-27 09:09:58 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jeremy Katz 2008-04-25 15:20:38 EDT
pk-application isn't really usable at 800x480 which is the resolution used by a
lot of smaller form factor devices.  You can't see the buttons for
remove/install, etc
Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-04-26 06:55:54 EDT
It's not really resigned for such small screens - but have you got a screenshot
of what it looks like please?
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 06:10:39 EDT
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
Comment 3 Brennan Ashton 2008-06-07 21:25:15 EDT
Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in
one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you.
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2008-06-09 12:30:09 EDT
See http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/gpk-lowres.png
Comment 5 Richard Hughes 2008-06-13 04:35:31 EDT
Do you think we should only set a minimum height if the screen is at least that
size? If we don't set a minimum size, the window comes up very squashed. What do
other apps do?
Comment 6 Jeremy Katz 2008-06-13 08:55:43 EDT
Most apps don't set a minimum size, or if they do, they do one that fits on a
640x480 screen.  
Comment 7 Richard Hughes 2008-10-17 13:17:34 EDT
*** Bug 467424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Richard Hughes 2008-10-17 13:18:44 EDT
I've fixed this upstream in 5d1788f59e2343ea84ec8e75f9016b5eddf80259, they'll be a fixed version in rawhide on Monday.
Comment 9 Valent Turkovic 2008-10-20 03:01:10 EDT
Thanks Richard you are amazing as always!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.