Bug 448101 - jadetex should restorecon -R /usr/share/texmf/web2c in%post
Summary: jadetex should restorecon -R /usr/share/texmf/web2c in%post
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: jadetex
Version: 5.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ondrej Vasik
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 445005
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-23 14:04 UTC by Milan Zázrivec
Modified: 2013-04-15 08:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-18 14:55:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0378 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE jadetex bug fix update 2009-03-18 14:55:29 UTC

Description Milan Zázrivec 2008-05-23 14:04:35 UTC
Description of problem:
Several jadetex files under /usr/share/texmf/web2c are installed with
incorrect selinux context (as a result of running fmtutil-sys in %post).
To correct this, jadetex should run restorecon -R /usr/share/texmf/web2c
in %post.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
jadetex-3.12-13.1.1 / RHEL5.2 GA

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEL5.2 GA, jadetex included, selinux enabled
2. # setfiles -vqn /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts \
   /usr/share/texmf/web2c|grep relabeling

Comment 1 Milan Zázrivec 2008-05-23 14:20:54 UTC
restorecon -R /usr/share/texmf/web2c in %post won't affect anaconda insallations.

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448099#c1

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-07-21 23:01:55 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-03-18 14:55:28 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0378.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.