Bug 448674 - X/Open Federated Naming service master map entry should be handled by autofs
Summary: X/Open Federated Naming service master map entry should be handled by autofs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: autofs
Version: 5.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ian Kent
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 462273
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-28 07:50 UTC by Ian Kent
Modified: 2009-01-20 21:45 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:45:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:0178 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE autofs bug fix update 2009-01-20 16:05:44 UTC

Description Ian Kent 2008-05-28 07:50:40 UTC
Description of problem:

The xfn map type is not recognized by the autofs master map
parser. When encountered a syntax error is reported instead
of it being ignored.

Since this entry is common in the default installed master
map of other OS automount configurations this should be
handled by autofs.

How reproducible:
always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. add master map entry with map type "-xfn"
2. start autofs.
  
Actual results:
Syntax error is reported and master map is not correctly
read.

Expected results:
Master map entry is correctly read and "not supported"
message issued.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2008-06-02 19:56:50 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:45:50 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0178.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.