Bug 449466 - FTBFS powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-3.fc9
Summary: FTBFS powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-3.fc9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: powerpc-utils-papr
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Roman Rakus
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/Fi...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-06-02 19:13 UTC by FTBFS
Modified: 2014-01-13 00:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-05 13:06:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
root.log.bz2 (1.55 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 19:13 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
build.log.bz2 (447 bytes, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 19:13 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
root.log.bz2 (2.32 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 19:13 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
build.log.bz2 (457 bytes, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 19:13 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
View All

Description FTBFS 2008-06-02 19:13:01 UTC 
powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-3.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
Comment 1 FTBFS 2008-06-02 19:13:21 UTC 
Created attachment 307568 [details]
root.log.bz2

root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2008-06-02 19:13:32 UTC 
Created attachment 307569 [details]
build.log.bz2

build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2008-06-02 19:13:44 UTC 
Created attachment 307570 [details]
root.log.bz2

root.log for x86_64
Comment 4 FTBFS 2008-06-02 19:13:46 UTC 
Created attachment 307571 [details]
build.log.bz2

build.log for x86_64
Comment 5 Roman Rakus 2008-06-05 10:00:44 UTC 
Why is powerpc-utils-papr building for i386 and x86_64? In spec file is
specified Exclusive arch for ppc and ppc64.
Comment 6 Matt Domsch 2008-06-05 13:06:03 UTC 
This is probably still a bug in my build system, which isn't koji.  My scripts
were supposed to exclude such from the report, I'll look into why it's not.
Comment 7 Matt Domsch 2008-06-06 03:55:45 UTC 
ah, now I remember.  rpm -q --qf "%{EXCLUSIVEARCH}" and EXCLUDEARCH is broken. 
I've written a small python helper which can extract those fields correctly. 
Future runs should exclude such packages now.  I apologize for the confusion
this may have caused.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.