Bug 449466 - FTBFS powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-3.fc9
FTBFS powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-3.fc9
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: powerpc-utils-papr (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
high Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Roman Rakus
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/Fi...
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FTBFS
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-02 15:13 EDT by FTBFS
Modified: 2014-01-12 19:07 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-05 09:06:22 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
root.log.bz2 (1.55 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 15:13 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log.bz2 (447 bytes, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 15:13 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details
root.log.bz2 (2.32 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 15:13 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log.bz2 (457 bytes, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 15:13 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description FTBFS 2008-06-02 15:13:01 EDT
powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-3.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
Comment 1 FTBFS 2008-06-02 15:13:21 EDT
Created attachment 307568 [details]
root.log.bz2

root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2008-06-02 15:13:32 EDT
Created attachment 307569 [details]
build.log.bz2

build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2008-06-02 15:13:44 EDT
Created attachment 307570 [details]
root.log.bz2

root.log for x86_64
Comment 4 FTBFS 2008-06-02 15:13:46 EDT
Created attachment 307571 [details]
build.log.bz2

build.log for x86_64
Comment 5 Roman Rakus 2008-06-05 06:00:44 EDT
Why is powerpc-utils-papr building for i386 and x86_64? In spec file is
specified Exclusive arch for ppc and ppc64.
Comment 6 Matt Domsch 2008-06-05 09:06:03 EDT
This is probably still a bug in my build system, which isn't koji.  My scripts
were supposed to exclude such from the report, I'll look into why it's not.
Comment 7 Matt Domsch 2008-06-05 23:55:45 EDT
ah, now I remember.  rpm -q --qf "%{EXCLUSIVEARCH}" and EXCLUDEARCH is broken. 
I've written a small python helper which can extract those fields correctly. 
Future runs should exclude such packages now.  I apologize for the confusion
this may have caused.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.