Bug 449661 - FTBFS libzzub-0.2.3-12.fc9
FTBFS libzzub-0.2.3-12.fc9
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libzzub (Show other bugs)
All Linux
high Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Alexander Kahl
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: 465078 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FTBFS
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-06-02 18:27 EDT by FTBFS
Modified: 2008-10-01 22:05 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-09-09 05:16:14 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
root.log.bz2 (2.39 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 18:27 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log.bz2 (5.37 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 18:27 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details
root.log.bz2 (6.97 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 18:27 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log.bz2 (5.37 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2008-06-02 18:28 EDT, FTBFS
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description FTBFS 2008-06-02 18:27:10 EDT
libzzub-0.2.3-12.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
Comment 1 FTBFS 2008-06-02 18:27:30 EDT
Created attachment 308149 [details]

root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2008-06-02 18:27:42 EDT
Created attachment 308150 [details]

build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2008-06-02 18:27:53 EDT
Created attachment 308151 [details]

root.log for x86_64
Comment 4 FTBFS 2008-06-02 18:28:05 EDT
Created attachment 308152 [details]

build.log for x86_64
Comment 5 FTBFS 2008-09-05 12:12:57 EDT
This package has Failed to Build From Source for many months.  Per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS, this package is now proposed for
removal from the distribution.  Please address this FTBFS bug
immediately, or this package will be removed from the distribution
within the next few weeks.

Thank you for your continued contributions to Fedora, and your
commitment to ensuring Fedora packages remain buildable from source
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-09-06 00:36:47 EDT
Alexander, ping?
Comment 7 Alexander Kahl 2008-09-08 03:36:26 EDT
Hi Mamoru,

I've succeeded in building a new version of libzzub long ago but it's not working, hence useless. All my project upstream tickets but one are being ignored so far - these tickets involve some no-nos and as long as upstream doesn't fix them I don't feel capable of continuing libzzub's and Aldrin's maintainership and prefer to focus on packages that "deserve" it.

This is one of the tickets mentioned:

I could compile libzzub with Fedora's flac but no workee so my hands are tied without upstream's support.

Your suggestion what to do?
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-09-08 11:24:52 EDT
Well, if you feel that the upstream is non-cooperative and you don't want
to maintain libzzub and aldrin anymore, you may orphan these packages.

In such case, follow the following wiki:
with declaring on fedora-devel-list by replying to this thread?
Comment 9 Alexander Kahl 2008-09-09 05:16:14 EDT
All steps to release ownership accomplished.
Comment 10 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-10-01 22:05:09 EDT
*** Bug 465078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.