Bug 450455 - Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules
Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension mod...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 435090
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-06-08 13:57 EDT by Michel Alexandre Salim
Modified: 2008-06-08 14:34 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-06-08 14:34:07 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-06-08 13:57:13 EDT
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/Cython.spec
SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/Cython-
Cython is a language that makes writing C extensions for the Python
language as easy as Python itself. Cython is based on the well-known
Pyrex, but supports more cutting edge functionality and optimizations.

The Cython language is very close to the Python language, but Cython
additionally supports calling C functions and declaring C types on
variables and class attributes. This allows the compiler to generate
very efficient C code from Cython code.

This makes Cython the ideal language for wrapping for external C
libraries, and for fast C modules that speed up the execution of
Python code.
Comment 1 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-06-08 14:10:51 EDT
Also uploaded under alternate naming; this makes it explicit it's
Python-related, gets rid of the capitalization and the later part matches the
naming under Debian

Comment 2 José Matos 2008-06-08 14:34:07 EDT
Please try another one, this one is already in Fedora. :-)

I did not consider this to be a python library so the naming scheme does not

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 435090 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.