This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2017-10-23 It is expected to last about 30 minutes
Bug 452521 - (perl-Coro) Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction
Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 667171
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On: perl-EV 452516 533723
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-23 10:57 EDT by Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)
Modified: 2011-01-05 11:51 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-05 11:46:41 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-06-23 10:57:45 EDT
Spec URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Coro.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Coro-4.743-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm
Description: Coroutine process abstraction
Comment 1 Marcela Mašláňová 2008-07-22 10:13:14 EDT
For this package is missing perl-EV.

Spec looks ok.
Comment 2 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-11-08 14:27:26 EST
SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Coro.spec
SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Coro-5.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Coroutine process abstraction

Update to 5.2 (still depends on perl-EV review)
Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2011-01-05 11:46:41 EST
I'm sorry for hijacking your package. I created the package independently. It's in F15 now. I added you as co-maintainer.

I excluded the perl(EV) dependency because it's optional. Once the perl-EV emerges in Fedora (I hope it's possible to compile it against libev. However libev must be upgraded first---bug #667164.), it can be reenabled.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 667171 ***
Comment 4 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2011-01-05 11:51:51 EST
Thx, that's alright for me.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.