Bug 455178 - NetworkManager fails to update via yum update
NetworkManager fails to update via yum update
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 451519
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: NetworkManager (Show other bugs)
8
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Dan Williams
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-13 10:30 EDT by James Crawford
Modified: 2008-07-24 18:38 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 18:38:49 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description James Crawford 2008-07-13 10:30:39 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.15) Gecko/20080702 Fedora/2.0.0.15-1.fc8 Firefox/2.0.0.15

Description of problem:
Running yum update returna the following.

Dependencies Resolved

=============================================================================
 Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Updating:
 NetworkManager          x86_64     1:0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8  updates           787 k
 NetworkManager-glib     x86_64     1:0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8  updates           131 k
 NetworkManager-glib     i386       1:0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8  updates           130 k
 NetworkManager-gnome    x86_64     1:0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8  updates           336 k
 NetworkManager-openvpn  x86_64     1:0.7.0-10.svn3632.fc8  updates           136 k
 NetworkManager-vpnc     x86_64     1:0.7.0-0.7.7.svn3627.fc8  updates           110 k
Installing for dependencies:
 ppp                     x86_64     2.4.4-2          fedora            387 k

Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install      1 Package(s)         
Update       6 Package(s)         
Remove       0 Package(s)         

Total download size: 2.0 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
Package NetworkManager conflicts with NetworkManager-vpnc < 1:0.7.0-0.7.7.svn3549.
Package NetworkManager conflicts with NetworkManager-openvpn < 1:0.7.0-9.svn3549.
Package NetworkManager needs NetworkManager-glib = 1:0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8, this is not available.
Package NetworkManager needs NetworkManager-glib = 1:0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8, this is not available.
Complete!


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
NetworkManager          x86_64     1:0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8  updates 

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Fedora 8 X86-64 with current updates 
2.as root run yum update
3

Actual Results:
See Discription

Expected Results:
Should have completed the update, problem appears to be in the packaging of NetworkManager.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeff Bastian 2008-07-13 11:30:05 EDT
I managed to upgrade to svn3675 by removing all i386 packages first.  Actually,
I removed all the NetworkManager* packages, then installed the previous updates
with 'rpm', and then 'yum -y update' successfully updated everything.  Now I
only have x86_64 packages installed.
Comment 2 Brendan LeFebvre 2008-07-14 11:08:08 EDT
Confirming Jeff's experience, though I only went so far as deleting the i386
packages. So two commands did it:

# yum erase NetworkManager*386
# yum update

Comment 3 James Crawford 2008-07-15 20:27:11 EDT
I got it fixed with a little overkill 

yum erase NetworkManager*
yum install NetworkManager*x86_64


I now only have x86_64 packages installes.

Thks.
Comment 4 Dan Williams 2008-07-18 13:41:23 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 451519 ***
Comment 5 Jeff Bastian 2008-07-18 13:44:26 EDT
This bug is for Fedora 8, not 9, so this is a clone of 451519, not a duplicate.
 Re-opening.
Comment 6 Dan Williams 2008-07-24 18:38:49 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 451519 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.