Description of problem: man-pages-fr-2.80.0-2.fc10.noarch has file conflict with sitecopy-0.16.5-1.fc10.i386 File: /usr/share/man/fr/man1/sitecopy.1.gz
I am sitecopy maintainer. What would be best in your view: to remove file from sitecopy or man-pages-fr ?
Of course, the better place for the translation of a man page is in the upstream tarball. And translators will be happy if upstream say "Hey translators! $PACKAGE man page(s) have been updated, could you please update your translation?" And of course, upstream have to let time enough to translators... At least 48H, a week is a good time. I'm the french man-pages maintainer (http://manpagesfr.free.fr), I also maintain some other french man-pages. Could you please give me an URL for your last tarball? I want to be sure the french man page you provide is the last translation. As a sample, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455277, french man page provided by rpm is older than the one provided by man-pages-fr, which is 6 years old.......
I agree with you completely, But I think as you already own this file in package please keep it (and update if necessary) and I will remove file from sitecopy. Thanks for quick response. http://www.manyfish.co.uk/sitecopy/sitecopy-0.16.6.tar.gz is latest tarball. It is the latest source. May you verify which one is whether man-pages-fr has latest man page or not. What say? If you confirm we close this bug then?
Aaah! Sorry, I seem to have messed it up. Please remove file from your package so that rawhide conflict is solved ASAP. I agree with you that file should be in tarball itself. Please confirm? Thanks.
Created attachment 313388 [details] patch for french man page translation
(In reply to comment #3) > I agree with you completely, But I think as you already own this file in > package please keep it (and update if necessary) and I will remove file from > sitecopy. No! I don't agree! As I said, the good place for a man page translation is the upstream package! > Thanks for quick response. > http://www.manyfish.co.uk/sitecopy/sitecopy-0.16.6.tar.gz is latest tarball. > > It is the latest source. May you verify which one is whether man-pages-fr has > latest man page or not. I just checked the two pages, differences are poor but the diff is big ;-) Big because there are some uneeded trailing space and white lines in the french man pages you hold. The only real differences are at lines 7 and 493-495 of the diff file. You should apply in the english man pages the changes I made in the SEE ALSO section (lines 493-495 in the diff) > What say? If you confirm we close this bug then? I (or my subsitute) will close this bug as this is a man-pages-fr bug, not a sitecopy bug.
(In reply to comment #4) > Aaah! > > Sorry, I seem to have messed it up. Please remove file from your package so > that rawhide conflict is solved ASAP. I agree with you that file should be in > tarball itself. > > Please confirm? Yes! sitecopy man page will be removed from man-pages-fr. By me or my subsitute, but no ASAP ;-) This isn't easy to find a subsitute to Zidane :-D
Please take your time. I feel I was drunk when I responded initially :-D Thanks ;-) for patch, I will send upstream, changes required for English man page.
*typo I will send English and fr man pages as suggested by you upstream. :-)
man-pages-fr-2.80.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/man-pages-fr-2.80.0-5.fc9
man-pages-fr-2.80.0-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/man-pages-fr-2.80.0-5.fc8
man-pages-fr-2.80.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
man-pages-fr-2.80.0-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.