Bug 461095 - Suspend to RAM fails to resume on ThinkPad T61
Summary: Suspend to RAM fails to resume on ThinkPad T61
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: John Feeney
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-09-04 05:02 UTC by James Cassell
Modified: 2013-01-10 07:05 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-07-14 17:11:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description James Cassell 2008-09-04 05:02:01 UTC
Description of problem:
When I suspend to RAM, everything appears to go fine.  When I open my computer, nothing happens.  When I press the power button, nothing happens.  The "suspend" light is still lit, but nothing will get the computer to come back on. (Though, pressing and holding for 4 seconds will make it go completely off.)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.6.26.3-29

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. System -> Shut Down -> Suspend
2. Wait for system to power down
3. try to revive system
  
Actual results:
nothing will get the computer to power back up

Expected results:
when I open the lid, or at the very least, press the power button, the computer should come back on, as it does in kernel 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.x86_64

Additional info:
Suspend to disk, or "Hibernate" works fine.
I have the nvidia driver from the livna repo, so I don't know if this is their fault or not.

Comment 1 James Cassell 2008-09-23 22:18:12 UTC
kernel-2.6.25.14-108.fc9.x86_64 is the last kernel that suspends and wakes up properly (relative term)

this problem still exists in 2.6.26.5-47.fc9.x86_64

Comment 2 Noel J. Bergman 2008-10-22 17:14:32 UTC
Also fails with T61p (6457-7WU), and worked previously.

Comment 3 Noel J. Bergman 2008-10-29 19:08:49 UTC
For what it is worth, resume from suspend to RAM largely works in Fedora 10, although I found and reported two defects.

Comment 4 Chuck Ebbert 2008-11-02 00:32:54 UTC
Does the 2.6.27.4 kernel headed for updates-testing work?

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.27.4-19.fc9

Comment 5 James Cassell 2008-11-02 03:56:43 UTC
no, it's still the same problem

Comment 6 Simo Sorce 2008-11-07 18:41:41 UTC
Try waiting for 5 minutes or more, see my comment on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468663#c10 I think these may actually all be really the same bug.

Comment 7 James Cassell 2008-12-15 23:03:28 UTC
This problem no longer exists in Fedora 10 (and I'm not using Fedora 9 anymore on this computer.)

Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2009-06-10 02:37:12 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 9.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '9'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2009-07-14 17:11:43 UTC
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.