Well, for 1.6.5-1:

* %{_libdir} in noarch package
--------------------------------------------
.src:40: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/*
--------------------------------------------
   - The explanation of this is shown by
     $ rpmlint -I libdir-macro-in-noarch-package . Generally
     this warning means that

     * If you rebuild this on i386, some files are installed under
       /usr/lib
     * On x86_64, they are put under /usr/lib64
     * However as this package is marked as _noarch_, the result
       binary rpm should be the same regardless of the architecture used
       when rebuilding

     So for noarch packages macros like %_libdir or %_lib should not
     be used. For the case of this package AFAIK even on 64 arch
     bonobo server picks up server files under %_prefix/lib (see:
     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149#c3 )

* python related dependency
  - Please examine python module related dependencies for this package
    and add them as Requires.
    ! Example:
      /usr/share/jalali-calendar/jcalendar.py contains the line:
---------------------------------------------
    25  import pygtk
    26  pygtk.require('2.0')
---------------------------------------------
      This means that this package should have "Requires: pygtk2".

    Note that such python related dependencies are not detected
    automatically by rpmbuild. To find out these dependencies, I usually
    try like below:
---------------------------------------------
$ grep -h 'import ' /usr/share/jalali-calendar/*py | sort | uniq
from gtk import gdk
from string import strip, lower
from xml.dom.minidom import getDOMImplementation, parse
from xml.parsers.expat import ExpatError
import birthdaydialog
import cairo
.......
-----------------------------------------------

One more issue
* python bytecompiling (BR: python)
  - If python is installed when rebuilding, all python files in this packages are
    bytecompile'd and some .py{c,o} files are also packaged (this is normal)
    However with koji build python is not installed by default so bytecompiling
    cannot be done.

    Please add "BuildRequires: python" (for python bytecompiling)

Sorry for the ugly package. I'll fix it ASAP.

A question about %{_libdir}. If I use %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers then this directory will not be owned by any packages which is undesirable as I know. Should I make this package architecture dependent?!

(In reply to comment #4)
> A question about %{_libdir}. If I use %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers then this
> directory will not be owned by any packages which is undesirable as I know.

Good catch, this directory should be owned by libbonobo.x86_64, filed as bug.
So for now please assume that this directory is (should be) owned by libbonobo.

New SRPM:

SPEC: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/d6qbOiGmOr3yBbab7jnrAJ/download/gnome-applet-jalali-calendar.spec

SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/bAHN-2H-er3BBHab7jnrAJ/download/gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-2.fc9.src.rpm

For -2:

* Python Requires
  - On F-10+, gnome-python2 is split into several package and
    so "Requires: gnome-python2" should be "Requires: gnome-python2-gnome"
    (See the discussion on:
     https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/thread.html#01779
     also:
     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456122 )
    Note that gnome-python2-gnome exists only on F-10+

    ! You can use
----------------------------------------------------
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 10
Requires: gnome-python2-gnome
%else
Requires: gnome-python2
%endif
-----------------------------------------------------

   - Generally speaking, I don't like to write redundant dependencies
     * pycairo, pygobject2 is Require'd by pygtk2 (ref bug 460105)
     * And pygtk2 is Require'd by pygtk2-libglade
     ! Note: gnome-python2-gconf Requires gnome-python2, but not
             gnome-python2-gnome, so on F-10+ "Requires: gnome-python2-gnome"
             is explicitly needed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
   This package (gnome-applet-jalali-calendar) is APPROVED by mtasaka
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks, I'll fix these.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: gnome-applet-jalali-calendar
Short Description: Jalali calendar panel applet for GNOME
Owners: hedayat
Branches: F-8 F-9
Cvsextras Commits: yes

cvs done

gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-3.fc9

gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-3.fc8

Now closing.

gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

gnome-applet-jalali-calendar-1.6.5-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.