Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This mixin class provides methods to test an HTTP::Server::Simple-based web server. Currently, it provides only one such method: started_ok. This package is a dependency of rt-3.8's testsuite.
Update: Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-2.fc10.src.rpm
The build log says t/pod-coverage....skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required for testing POD coverage t/pod.............skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD Is this really intended ? Both are in rawhide already
(In reply to comment #2) > Is this really intended ? Both are in rawhide already No, this wasn't intended - Seems as if I am a bit swamped with Fedora's bureaucracy and infrastructure defects ;) However, in general, these two are special, because these only check for a package's integrity/cleanness and don't actually check a package for functionality. It's the reason why some packagers prefer to systematically ignore them, while others prefer to add them. I am in the latter group, and will add them ASAP.
Next try: Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc10.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM:perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple.src: E: unknown-key GPG#8ff214b4 --> ignorable binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Pack aging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the l icense(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: d80afc773737dc40e19024dedf455b04f3ce021b IPC-Run-SafeHandles-0.02.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. -> package is noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. All tests (%make check) pass ================ *** APPROVED *** ================
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple Short Description: Test::More functions for HTTP::Server::Simple Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: perl-sig
cvs done.
perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc9
perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc8
perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.09-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
corsepiu is listed as not interested in EPEL Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple New Branches: EL-6 Owners: tremble
CVS done.