Bug 465989 - javacc: New version needed
Summary: javacc: New version needed
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: javacc
Version: 10
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matt Wringe
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: 319161
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2008-10-07 16:25 UTC by Jerry James
Modified: 2009-09-03 14:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-09-03 14:32:49 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Spec file for JavaCC 4.1 (5.72 KB, text/plain)
2008-10-22 15:20 UTC, Jerry James
no flags Details

Description Jerry James 2008-10-07 16:25:39 UTC
Description of problem:
I am working on a new PMD release.  Version 4.2.3 of PMD needs JavaCC 4.1 to correctly generate its code.  (The PMD sources ship with Java code that was generated by a JavaCC 4.1 prerelease version, which I find a bit scary.)  We currently ship JavaCC 4.0.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. N/A
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
I am willing to help out with the upgrade, if needed.

Comment 1 Jerry James 2008-10-22 15:20:57 UTC
Created attachment 321167 [details]
Spec file for JavaCC 4.1

Here is a spec file that makes the change to 4.1.  It also fixes a few unclean things in the current spec file; see the ChangeLog entry I added for details.

Comment 2 Jerry James 2008-11-25 21:51:04 UTC
Matt, is there any hope of upgrading JavaCC soon?  I would like to push the PMD update out.  Please respond.

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 03:38:13 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 4 Matt Wringe 2008-12-04 00:58:12 UTC
Updated and build in rawhide. If that works for you I can push an update for Fedora 10.

FYI, all my packages are open in devel for anyone to make changes since it usually takes me a while to get to some of these updates.

Comment 5 Jerry James 2009-04-30 15:28:57 UTC
Sorry, I must have missed the email on this bug during the December rush.  The new PMD is only in F-11+, so what you've done already is sufficient.  Thank you!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.