Bug 466180 - evolution default sorting broken
Summary: evolution default sorting broken
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 466431
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-10-08 21:43 UTC by Dave Maley
Modified: 2008-10-10 12:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-10 12:46:24 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot #1 (184.25 KB, image/png)
2008-10-08 21:44 UTC, Dave Maley
no flags Details
screenshot #2 (184.53 KB, image/png)
2008-10-08 21:44 UTC, Dave Maley
no flags Details
screenshot #3 (184.06 KB, image/png)
2008-10-08 21:44 UTC, Dave Maley
no flags Details

Description Dave Maley 2008-10-08 21:43:04 UTC
Description of problem:
evo seems to want to push unread messages to the top, moving read messages below unread messages.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-2.24.0-2.fc10.x86_64


How reproducible:
every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. goto folder w/ unread messages
2. select 1st unread message
3. goto different folder and back again
  
Actual results:
read message will now appear at bottom, below all unread messages


Expected results:
sorting doesn't change


Additional info:
* leave as default sort (ie. don't click any column headers)

I've also seen some strange sorting behavior in folders w/ mailing list archives which seems likely related.

I'll attach 3 screenshots:
- ss1.png == all unread
- ss2.png == 1st message read, others left unread
- ss3.png == messages re-ordered
***reproduction step #3 was performed between ss2.png and ss3.png***

Comment 1 Dave Maley 2008-10-08 21:44:10 UTC
Created attachment 319806 [details]
screenshot #1

Comment 2 Dave Maley 2008-10-08 21:44:32 UTC
Created attachment 319807 [details]
screenshot #2

Comment 3 Dave Maley 2008-10-08 21:44:58 UTC
Created attachment 319808 [details]
screenshot #3

Comment 4 Matthew Barnes 2008-10-10 12:46:24 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 466431 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.