Bug 468222 - Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brian Pepple
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 476599 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 468223 476600
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-10-23 16:29 UTC by Luke Macken
Modified: 2016-09-20 02:39 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-16 22:32:37 UTC
Type: ---
bdpepple: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Luke Macken 2008-10-23 16:29:45 UTC
Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-transaction.spec
SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-transaction-1.0-0.1.a1.fc9.src.rpm
Description:
This package contains a generic transaction implementation for Python. It is
mainly used by the ZODB, though.

Comment 1 Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 23:10:09 UTC
MD5Sum:
93b4f5d753b4ba99b201cce05c25e549  transaction-1.0a1.tar.gz

Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Upstream source tarball verified
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* Package builds in Mock.
* Package installs and uninstalls cleanly

Bad:
* License tag should be 'ZPLv2.1', not 'ZPL'.
* rpmlint produces the following errors:
python-transaction.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-0.1.a2 ['1.0-0.1.a1.fc9', '1.0-0.1.a1']
python-transaction.noarch: W: invalid-license ZPL

You can fix the changelog & license tag when you import it into CVS.

+1 APPROVED

Comment 2 Luke Macken 2008-11-19 15:37:41 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: python-transaction
Short Description: This package contains a generic transaction implementation for Python.
Owners: lmacken
Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-23 03:55:18 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 4 Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 22:50:35 UTC
*** Bug 476599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 22:54:00 UTC
Btw, License tag is still not fixed in CVS.

Also, no updates for F-10 and F-9 yet (not sure if it's even been built in rawhide).

Comment 6 Luke Macken 2008-12-18 21:35:18 UTC
License tag fixed.  Building F-9 F-10 updates now.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 17:21:13 UTC
python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc10

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 17:21:16 UTC
python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 08:32:55 UTC
python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-transaction'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11428

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 08:39:48 UTC
python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-transaction'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11457

Comment 11 Brian Pepple 2009-02-15 16:21:10 UTC
If this has been built, and pushed to stable this bug can be closed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.