Bug 475508 - Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation
Summary: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Ja...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mamoru TASAKA
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 227067 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-12-09 15:41 UTC by Sandro Mathys
Modified: 2010-11-18 21:14 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-11 13:51:32 UTC
Type: ---
mtasaka: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sandro Mathys 2008-12-09 15:41:46 UTC
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-0.1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: Javassist enables Java programs to define a new class at runtime and to
modify a class file when the JVM loads it. Unlike other similar
bytecode editors, Javassist provides two levels of API: source level
and bytecode level. If the users use the source-level API, they can
edit a class file without knowledge of the specifications of the Java
bytecode. The whole API is designed with only the vocabulary of the
Java language. You can even specify inserted bytecode in the form of
source text; Javassist compiles it on the fly. On the other hand, the
bytecode-level API allows the users to directly edit a class file as
other editors.

rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or
errors.

I'd still need a sponsor.

Comment 1 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-12 01:01:18 UTC
Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg.

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-12-15 14:59:38 UTC
(Removing NEEDSPONSOR)

Comment 3 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-16 04:32:10 UTC
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10.src.rpm

New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was
reviewed.

Comment 4 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 21:59:03 UTC
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm

Rebuilt on rawhide.

Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-12-22 18:58:40 UTC
For 3.9.0-1

* License
  - The license tag for this package should be
    "MPLv1.1 or LGPLv2+".

* Macros
  - Use macros consistently (for cosmetic issue). Please
    use %{name} or %name, not both.

Other issues are okay. Please modify the issue above
when importing into Fedora CVS.

------------------------------------------------------------
   This package (javassist) is APPROVED by mtasaka
------------------------------------------------------------

Comment 6 Sandro Mathys 2009-01-03 18:47:30 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: javassist
Short Description: The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation
Owners: red
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 20:45:24 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 22:08:31 UTC
javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 22:08:34 UTC
javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10

Comment 10 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-01-11 13:51:32 UTC
Okay, thanks.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2009-01-15 03:02:47 UTC
javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2009-01-15 03:06:27 UTC
javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-18 21:14:33 UTC
*** Bug 227067 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.