Bug 479089 - system-config-network does not require needed gnome-python2-bonobo
Summary: system-config-network does not require needed gnome-python2-bonobo
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 472154
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: system-config-network
Version: 10
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Harald Hoyer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-01-07 00:55 UTC by Rick Wagner
Modified: 2009-01-07 14:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-07 14:16:47 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rick Wagner 2009-01-07 00:55:53 UTC
Description of problem:
I did a KDE only installation of F10.  I wanted to use S-C-N in place of NetworkManager.  yum installed S-C-N, ran it, set the settings, then did a "File->Save".  There was a message on the console (started S-C-N from a command line), something about missing bonobo interface.  Exiting S-C-N prompted me to save my changes; I clicked 'Yes', but the app did not close.  Tried to exit again, and got the same message.  Exited without saving, then restarted; my changes were not set.

Yum installed gnome-python2-bonobo, reran S-C-N and worked properly.

It appears S-C-N package does not have necessary requires for gnome-python2-bonobo.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-network.noarch         1.5.93-2.fc10                       
system-config-network-tui.noarch     1.5.93-2.fc10
gnome-python2-bonobo.i386            2.22.3-1.fc10

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install KDE only config (i.e. no gnome-python2-bonobo)
2. Run S-C-N, make changes; attempt to save

Actual results:
Changes do not get saved

Expected results:
Changes should be saved

Additional info:

Just a guess, but a simple test on a working system would be to yum erase gnome-python2-bonobo; it is likely that you would not get a dependency failure though you should.

Comment 1 Jiri Moskovcak 2009-01-07 14:16:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 472154 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.