Bug 482867 - ximtoppm segfaults
Summary: ximtoppm segfaults
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: netpbm
Version: 5.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact: BaseOS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 482891
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-01-28 16:29 UTC by Milos Malik
Modified: 2013-07-02 23:34 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 482891 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-02 09:19:00 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
strace output (2.44 KB, text/plain)
2009-01-28 16:29 UTC, Milos Malik
no flags Details
ltrace output (282 bytes, text/plain)
2009-01-28 16:31 UTC, Milos Malik
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:1268 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE netpbm bug fix update 2009-09-01 09:30:26 UTC

Description Milos Malik 2009-01-28 16:29:16 UTC
Created attachment 330244 [details]
strace output

Description of problem:
When I run the utility without parameters it segfaults.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
netpbm-progs-10.35-6.1.el5_2.2

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# ximtoppm 
Segmentation fault
  
Actual results:
The utility segfaults

Expected results:
The utility does not segfault.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Milos Malik 2009-01-28 16:31:29 UTC
Created attachment 330245 [details]
ltrace output

Comment 2 Milos Malik 2009-01-28 16:41:10 UTC
The package netpbm-progs-10.35.54-1.fc10 in Fedora 10 is also affected.

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2009-03-26 17:21:13 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 09:19:00 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1268.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.