Bug 488035 - Review Request: tigervnc - A TigerVNC remote display system - rename from TightVNC
Summary: Review Request: tigervnc - A TigerVNC remote display system - rename from Tig...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Horák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-03-02 10:00 UTC by Adam Tkac
Modified: 2013-04-30 23:42 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-03 21:37:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
dan: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2009-03-03 20:15:20 UTC
formal review is here, see the notes below:

OK	source files match upstream (no difference between the included archive and fresh svn checkout):
	    7957167797dd10c5f3542dab4aaa25834aab41ec  tigervnc-0.0.90-20090302svn3621.tar.bz2
OK	package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK	specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK	dist tag is present.
OK	license field matches the actual license.
OK	license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package.
OK	latest version is being packaged.
OK	BuildRequires are proper.
OK	compiler flags are appropriate.
OK	%clean is present.
OK	package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
OK	debuginfo package looks complete.
OK*	rpmlint is silent.
OK	final provides and requires look sane.
N/A	%check is present and all tests pass.
OK	no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK	owns the directories it creates.
OK	doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK	no duplicates in %files.
OK	file permissions are appropriate.
OK*	correct scriptlets present.
OK	code, not content.
OK	documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK	%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK	no headers.
OK	no pkgconfig files.
OK	no libtool .la droppings.
OK*	is GUI app, desktop file is present

- rpmlint complains a bit
tigervnc-server-module.x86_64: W: no-documentation
 => OK
tigervnc-server-module.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet tigervnc-server-module-0.0.90-0.1.20090302svn3621.fc11.x86_64.rpm
 => OK
tigervnc-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name vncserver
 => OK
tigervnc.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 18, tab: line 1)
 => please fix

- there is new version of "icon-cache" scriptlets approved (IIRC), but not yet moved from Drafts, so keep the current one
- drop "--vendor fedora" when install the desktop file
- you can include unix/README as %doc, it contains some acknowledgments that would be nice to distribute

Comment 3 Dan Horák 2009-03-03 20:29:40 UTC
All issues fixed, package is APPROVED.

Comment 4 Adam Tkac 2009-03-03 20:31:14 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: tigervnc
Short Description: A TigerVNC remote display system
Owners: atkac
Branches: devel
InitialCC:

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-03 20:40:15 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 6 Patrice Dumas 2009-03-10 14:07:49 UTC
tightvnc (and, incidentaly, vnc/realvnc) should, in my opinion, be properly
orphaned, especially tightvnc that had a release in [Mar 05, 2009] according to the web site.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.