Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-notification/django-notification.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-notification/django-notification-0.1.2-2.src.rpm Description: Many sites need to notify users when certain events have occurred and to allow configurable options as to how those notifications are to be received. The project aims to provide a Django app for this sort of functionality. This includes: * submission of notification messages by other apps * notification messages on signing in * notification messages via email (configurable by user) * notification messages via feed
Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1216036 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 3e485b0e047b70bfb00c783deae9e44b django-notification-0.1.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + egg file generated from source. Suggestions: 1) I will suggest to use %doc CONTRIBUTORS.txt LICENSE.txt docs/* will make not to create docs named directory 2) Change %define to %global APPROVED.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-notification Short Description: User notification management for the Django web framework Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5
cvs done.
If this package is built for all requested branches then can we have this review closed now?