Bug 493314 - netstat -s does not show TcpExt
Summary: netstat -s does not show TcpExt
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: net-tools
Version: 5.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Popelka
QA Contact: BaseOS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 435554
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-04-01 11:53 UTC by Olivier Fourdan
Modified: 2018-10-20 03:27 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 435554
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-16 09:27:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2009:1677 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE net-tools bug fix update 2009-12-16 09:26:47 UTC

Description Olivier Fourdan 2009-04-01 11:53:26 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #435554 +++

This problem also affect EL5 with the kernel-rt (2.6.24.7)

Description of problem:
because of silly fixed length buffer of 1024 bytes in statistics.c:process_fd(),
netstat -s fails with "error parsing /proc/net/netstat: Success"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.60-86

How reproducible:
depends on kernel, 2.6.23 works, 2.6.24.3 does not work.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. netstat -s
  
Actual results:
parsing fails

Expected results:
show TcpExt stats

Additional info:

Created an attachment (id=296453)
double fgets buffer size


--- Additional comment from rvokal on 2008-03-04 10:40:39 EDT ---

Patch applied on rawhide

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-12-16 09:27:10 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1677.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.