Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://bjk.sourceforge.net/pwmd/ Description: Password Manager Daemon is a server that provides a way for applications to securely store and retrieve data at a centralized location. The data is stored in an (optionally AES256 encrypted) XML file and clients connect and send commands to manipulate the data. Some of the features include: * Multi-threaded. More than one client may access the data at the same time. * A key cache so clients won't need to enter a key each time a file is opened or saved. * Key retrieval via pinentry(1). * Configuration file which supports file specific settings including: encryption iterations, cache expiration and encryption key or key file and more. * Compressed data file support. * Logging to file and/or syslog. * Secure memory usage. PWMD will zero out memory before freeing it and also has the option to lock the entire process in RAM to avoid swapping the data to virtual memory. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307797 rpmlint output: [fab@laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint pwmd* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pwmd-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* Fri Jul 17 2009 Fabian Affolter <fabian> - 2.1-1 - Removed COMMANDS from doc - Updated to new upstream version 2.1 Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
I went to do an unofficial review of the latest version, and while it seems to work on F12 it fails to build on rawhide. As far as the spec file goes, everything seems to agree nicely with the packaging guidelines. If you're desperate for something to fix there you could add more translations of the package metadata. pwmd 2.2 rawhide scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1915987
2.7 was release some time ago. I think that it's time for an update.
The latest release is 2.0 but for this release libassuan 2.0.0 is needed.
I note that libassuan 2.0 is in F14 and rawhide currently.
All looks good here Fabian, although this version is -- understandably -- now quite old (current upstream is 2.18) Nevertheless, this version still builds fine locally on F13 for me and on Koji for F15. Some items are no longer required in the specfile, so you could remove: * BuildRoot: * first line of %install * empty %build section * %clean section (although not having them will cause rpmlint to cry) ACCEPT - = N/A / = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [/] Rpmlint output is clean: $ rpmlint SRPMS/pwmd-2.1-1.fc13.src.rpm pwmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pinentry -> pin entry, pin-entry, pinery pwmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> dyslogia, systole, slogan 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/pwmd-2.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm pwmd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> dyslogia, systole, slogan 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/pwmd-debuginfo-2.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific items [/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. COPYING [/] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum SOURCES/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz 2c770efd122229bd96c15e56ffa62e22 SOURCES/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz $ md5sum ~/Download/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz 2c770efd122229bd96c15e56ffa62e22 /home/rlandmann/Download/pwmd-2.1.tar.gz [/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2572948 [/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly (with the %find_lang macro) [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [/] Package does not bundle copies of system libraries [/] Package is not relocatable. [/] Package must own all directories that it creates. [/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [-] Permissions on files are set properly [/] %files section includes a %defattr(...) line [/] Package consistently uses macros. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] -devel packages require base package with full versioning. [/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [/] Filenames are valid UTF-8 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [/] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [/] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested through koji [/] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: f13 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] Subpackages other than -devel require the base package as a fully versioned dependency [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct (normally in -devel) [-] File based requires are sane. [/] Package contains man pages for binaries and scripts.
Thanks for the review (In reply to comment #6) > > Some items are no longer required in the specfile, so you could remove: > * BuildRoot: > * first line of %install > * empty %build section > * %clean section > (although not having them will cause rpmlint to cry) I will take your notes into account while updating to the latest release of pwmd.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: pwmd Short Description: A server for storing application data at a central location Owners: fab Branches: F-14 F-13 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
pwmd-2.18-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pwmd-2.18-1.fc14
pwmd-2.18-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pwmd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pwmd-2.18-1.fc14
pwmd-2.18-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.