Spec URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer.spec SRPM URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer-2.26.0-1.aw_fc11.src.rpm Description: A full control ALSA mixer application for GNOME. Per FESco meeting of April 24th 2009, for Fedora 11 release. I previously submitted gnome-alsamixer to satisfy this proposal - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 - but Bastien Nocera said the old gnome-volume-control code would be preferable as it is still actively maintained. This is a package of the old gnome-volume-control code from gnome-media, renamed gst-mixer (the name of the directory it lives in within the gnome-media code).
I have tested and for me are good, now I can make the volume higher
A few things worth noting: * You really, really, really don't need those macro defines at the top. Half of them aren't used. Just put the versions in the BuildRequires explicitly. * Fix the patch to apply without fuzz, please? :) Then, drop the default_fuzz macro define. * The %{gettext_package} macro is fine, but please use %global instead of %define. * Are you sure --disable-pulseaudio is correct?
For the first point: I wanted to keep the gst-mixer spec as close as possible to the gnome-media spec, this seemed sensible. So that's where the %define forest comes from. I wouldn't have created it myself. :) If you don't think it's important to have the two specs as similar as possible, I'll happily take them out. The patch applies without fuzz, I think, that setting just came from the gnome-media spec again. I'll take it out. Yes, I want --disable-pulseaudio, because we really just want this mixer to talk to ALSA, not Pulse. The *new* mixer is intended to be the mixer for Pulse. Having said that, it doesn't seem to have any particular effect, because gst-mixer once built still seems able to talk to Pulse - you get a choice in the drop-down in gst-mixer for Pulse mixer as well as ALSA mixer. Sigh. Updated package coming in a few minutes. I'll wait to hear back on the define forest, but change the other bits.
OK - spec and .src.rpm updated, same URL.
You still really don't need those macros. There is no reason to keep unnecessary cruft in a package, derived from another or not. Also, it is generally good form to bump the release and add an entry to the changelog whenever making a change to the spec file, even during review.
OK, bumped to -2.aw_fc11 with that change made: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer-2.26.0-2.aw_fc11.src.rpm
ping?
Andreas: Sorry for hijacking here, but we really need to have this review done. I hope you don't mind I take over? OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 3d519bc7d812aed8f6e4288b6d3cdf26 gnome-media-2.26.0.tar.bz2 3d519bc7d812aed8f6e4288b6d3cdf26 gnome-media-2.26.0.tar.bz2.orig OK - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Should the Requires: gnome-media be versioned? Or will it cause any issue for this to be out of step with gnome-media? I suspect not, but though I would mention it. 2. rpmlint says: gst-mixer.src:163: W: macro-in-%changelog defines Minor issue... change to %%defines in changelog? :) gst-mixer.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gst-mixer.schemas Can be ignored. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Fix the %%define and address if gnome-media requires should be versioned before import?
I can't really see any big problems that would be caused by not versioning the gnome-media requires, but let me know if I'm missing anything. I'm just about to send a revised -2 package with the changelog changed (it seems a bit recursive to bump to -3 and add a changelog entry to say I changed the changelog...:>)
OK, it's up now. Same URL as the previous -2 package.
Looks dandy. Feel free to request cvs.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gst-mixer Short Description: legacy mixer for GNOME Owners: adamwill Branches: F-11 InitialCC:
cvs done.
ok, review is complete, rawhide build is done. thanks very much, kevin.