Bug 501424 - [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 524457
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
Version: 10
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pravin Satpute
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-05-19 03:39 UTC by XinSun
Modified: 2009-09-23 05:52 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-23 05:52:55 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
0BB8-0BC1.jpg (875 bytes, image/jpeg)
2009-05-19 03:39 UTC, XinSun 		no flags Details
0BB9-0BC1.jpg (1004 bytes, image/jpeg)
2009-05-19 03:39 UTC, XinSun 		no flags Details
0B9C-0BC1.jpg (950 bytes, image/jpeg)
2009-05-19 03:40 UTC, XinSun 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description XinSun 2009-05-19 03:39:20 UTC 
Created attachment 344556 [details]
0BB8-0BC1.jpg

Description of problem:
When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC1" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC1" in gedit, the results were
wrong.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge
2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC1" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC1" in gedit.

Actual results:
The result are 

U+0BB8 U+0BC1  ஸு

U+0BB9 U+0BC1  ஹு

and they are different from the correct images.

Expected results:
Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC1.jpg and 0BB9-0BC1.jpg
Comment 1 XinSun 2009-05-19 03:39:44 UTC 
Created attachment 344557 [details]
0BB9-0BC1.jpg
Comment 2 XinSun 2009-05-19 03:40:21 UTC 
Created attachment 344558 [details]
0B9C-0BC1.jpg
Comment 3 XinSun 2009-05-19 03:40:37 UTC 
"U+0B9C U+0BC1"  has the same problem.
Actural results:
"U+0B9C U+0BC1" ஜு

Expected results:
Please see the attachment 0B9C-0BC1.jpg
Comment 4 Parag Nemade 2009-09-04 06:38:07 UTC 
felix,
  Can you give correct image for following combination?

1) U+0BB8 U+0BC1
2) U+0BB9 U+0BC1
3) U+0B9C U+0BC1

Or you can just tell us if above(comment#1 and comment#2) attached images are
the correct rendering for these combinations?
Comment 5 Felix 2009-09-07 06:29:29 UTC 
Attached image is Perfect. So the rendering is not correct.
Comment 6 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 14:15:24 UTC 
From Comment #1 and #2

The character classes for the aforementioned characters (forming respective
syllable combination) are defined correctly in pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386.


Additionally, I noticed "serafettin-cartoon-fonts" yields correct/desired results for following combination:

1) U+0BB8 U+0BC1
2) U+0BB9 U+0BC1
3) U+0B9C U+0BC1

Whereas, lohit-tamil-fonts fails to give correct results for above combination.

I have filed a bug against lohit-tamil-fonts (see bug 524457). 
I have attached corrected font file in the same bug, which yields the expected results.
Comment 7 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 05:33:15 UTC 
From Comment #6,

Correct behaviour of following combination:

1) U+0BB8 U+0BC1
2) U+0BB9 U+0BC1
3) U+0B9C U+0BC1

can now be  obtained from build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide).
Comment 8 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 05:52:55 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 524457 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.