Bug 513609
| Summary: | ipmitool wrong commandline parsing | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Karel Volný <kvolny> | ||||
| Component: | OpenIPMI | Assignee: | Jan Safranek <jsafrane> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 5.3 | CC: | rvokal | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-12-02 12:20:37 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Karel Volný
2009-07-24 13:31:53 UTC
ipmitool *checks* number of input parameters, but it forgets to describe them. The correct syntax of sol set is: ipmitool sol set <name> <value> [channel] [noguard] where 'channel' is channel number and 'noguard' is indication, whether the 'set' operation should be automatically wrapped into set-in-progress, commit-write and set-complete operations by ipmitool (to ensure transaction safety; default) or the user invokes these operation manually (by using 'noguard' parameter). I'll add note to man page and help output. Created attachment 358568 [details]
patch proposal
patch sent upstream (it arrived to the list, but I can't see it in the archive...)
here is the archive link: http://www.mail-archive.com/ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01286.html An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1629.html |