This causes a massive performance problem on Windows x64.
I don't know. Some kind of windows performance benchmark may be?
You can use iperf/netperf or any other benchmark.
Please measure the vmexists using kvm_stat
(In reply to comment #13)
> You can use iperf/netperf or any other benchmark.
> Please measure the vmexists using kvm_stat
OK . I will do the testing. Thank you very much for the information
*** Bug 520723 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 363168 [details]
patch to avoid calling adjust_vmx_controls() twice
------- Comment From firstname.lastname@example.org 2009-12-04 14:50 EDT-------
What is the status of this bug? Is the RH bug 520285 resolved yet?
Patch reviewed? Accepted? Target for fix?
(In reply to comment #18)
> ------- Comment From email@example.com 2009-12-04 14:50 EDT-------
> What is the status of this bug? Is the RH bug 520285 resolved yet?
> Patch reviewed? Accepted? Target for fix?
Patch was accepted and included on build kvm-83-109.el5.
5.4.z status was tracked at bug #521793 (it was released on advisory http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1465.html )
------- Comment From firstname.lastname@example.org 2010-02-09 16:33 EDT-------
fixed in errata update
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.