This causes a massive performance problem on Windows x64.
I don't know. Some kind of windows performance benchmark may be?
You can use iperf/netperf or any other benchmark. Please measure the vmexists using kvm_stat
(In reply to comment #13) > You can use iperf/netperf or any other benchmark. > Please measure the vmexists using kvm_stat OK . I will do the testing. Thank you very much for the information
*** Bug 520723 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 363168 [details] patch to avoid calling adjust_vmx_controls() twice
------- Comment From amdavis.com 2009-12-04 14:50 EDT------- What is the status of this bug? Is the RH bug 520285 resolved yet? Patch reviewed? Accepted? Target for fix?
(In reply to comment #18) > ------- Comment From amdavis.com 2009-12-04 14:50 EDT------- > What is the status of this bug? Is the RH bug 520285 resolved yet? > Patch reviewed? Accepted? Target for fix? Patch was accepted and included on build kvm-83-109.el5. 5.4.z status was tracked at bug #521793 (it was released on advisory http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1465.html )
------- Comment From habanero.com 2010-02-09 16:33 EDT------- fixed in errata update http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1465.html
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0271.html