Bug 530944 - libXxf86dga-devel conflicts with xorg-x11-proto-devel
Summary: libXxf86dga-devel conflicts with xorg-x11-proto-devel
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 530499
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libXxf86dga
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-10-26 08:33 UTC by Paul Bolle
Modified: 2014-06-18 09:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-26 11:42:19 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul Bolle 2009-10-26 08:33:50 UTC
Description of problem:
libXxf86dga-devel-1.0.99.1-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.4-34.fc12.noarch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.0.99.1-1.fc12 

How reproducible:
Do a yum-builddep for wine in current rawhide. It tries to pull in libXxf86dga-devel-1.0.99.1-1.fc12.i686 which conflicts with xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.4-34.fc12.noarch


Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
See above.

Expected results:
Well, no such conflict.

Additional info:
Could be a wine (packaging) bug. However since bug #375981, bug #400721, and bug #416951 (the last three bugs reported against libXxf86dga) all are build problems that received no human attention (they were closed by bots) I decided to report against this product.

Comment 1 Paul Bolle 2009-10-26 08:45:38 UTC
Possibly a duplicate of bug #530449 and bug #530464.

Comment 2 Paul Bolle 2009-10-26 11:42:19 UTC
The "dist-f12-updates-candidate" (whatever that means) found at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1767972 (to which bug #530499 pointed) allowed the wine .srpm to compile without errors (as far as I can tell). Closing as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 530499 ***

Comment 3 Paul Bolle 2009-10-26 15:01:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 530499 ***  

s/530499/530449/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.