Bug 532533 – Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java

Bug 532533 - Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java

Summary:	Review request: wsdl4j - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	FE-NEW
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2009-11-02 13:01 EST by Mary Ellen Foster
Modified:	2009-11-16 16:24 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-11-16 16:24:10 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-02 13:01:44 EST

Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/wsdl4j.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/wsdl4j-1.6.2-2.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
The Web Services Description Language for Java Toolkit (WSDL4J) allows the
creation, representation, and manipulation of WSDL documents describing
services.  This codebase will eventually serve as a reference implementation
of the standard created by JSR110.



This package was imported from JPackage

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-02 15:17:51 EST

How does this differ from the existing wsdl4j package that's already in Fedora?

Comment 2 Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-16 16:24:10 EST

Sorry, it doesn't differ at all -- the JPackage version has a different name and I didn't realise that this was the same package ultimately.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.