+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #503185 +++ Unfortunately the xemacs part of the build has been breaking fedora builds of ddskk for a long time now - I guess I should just disable xemacs-ddskk for now... --- Additional comment from petersen on 2009-06-22 02:11:42 EDT --- ddskk should also be renamed to emacs-ddskk or emacs-common-ddskk, which probably needs a new package review... I don't suppose you are interested in maintaining it for fedora, Yamato-san? :) --- Additional comment from petersen on 2009-06-22 02:45:48 EDT --- > Unfortunately the xemacs part of the build has been breaking fedora builds of > ddskk for a long time now Ok, I was confused and thinking about ddskk-13.1 I haven't been able to build yet successfully for fedora. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428775 I'll backport this to f11 and f10. --- Additional comment from updates on 2009-06-22 02:57:40 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 --- Additional comment from petersen on 2009-06-22 04:08:07 EDT --- > Ok, I was confused and thinking about ddskk-13.1 I haven't been able to build > yet successfully for fedora. Nevermind, I finally built ddskk-13.1 for rawhide but had to drop xemacs since it is still on apel-10.6. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428851 --- Additional comment from ville.skytta on 2009-06-22 10:35:31 EDT --- (Changing Cc to current Fedora XEmacs maintainer.) --- Additional comment from loganjerry on 2009-06-22 12:45:11 EDT --- I will take a look at upgrading XEmacs to apel 10.7. --- Additional comment from updates on 2009-06-24 15:42:33 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --- Additional comment from updates on 2009-07-03 15:36:25 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --- Additional comment from loganjerry on 2009-10-28 13:34:47 EDT --- XEmacs has apel 10.7 in F-11+ now, if that matters. I'm willing to help with any further problems. --- Additional comment from petersen on 2009-10-29 03:56:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > XEmacs has apel 10.7 in F-11+ now, if that matters. Thanks - good to know, but xemacs-packages-extra.spec still provides apel-xemacs = 10.6-6. Also build still fails after that: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1775997&name=build.log --- Additional comment from petersen on 2009-10-29 04:11:03 EDT --- more info on the failed build if it helps: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1775997 --- Additional comment from loganjerry on 2009-10-29 10:51:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Thanks - good to know, but xemacs-packages-extra.spec still > provides apel-xemacs = 10.6-6. Oops. I've got a font bugfix coming, so I'll fix this at the same time. > Also build still fails after that: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1775997&name=build.log Okay, I'll take a look. Thanks for trying. --- Additional comment from loganjerry on 2009-10-29 12:19:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366657) Patch to support building with XEmacs This patch makes a couple of path changes in SKK-CFG for XEmacs. --- Additional comment from loganjerry on 2009-10-29 12:20:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366658) Source patch for XEmacs This patch changes two instances of a character defined using the Emacs-only syntax ?\xABC into the syntax ?\uABCD, which is supported by both Emacs and XEmacs. --- Additional comment from updates on 2009-10-29 16:28:36 EDT --- xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-3.fc11 --- Additional comment from loganjerry on 2009-10-29 16:30:39 EDT --- I've pushed new builds into F-11, F-12, and devel that fix the apel-xemacs provides. I've submitted F-11 to testing and requested that the F-12 build be tagged into f12-final. That plus the patches in comment 16 and comment 17 fix everything for me. Let me know if there is anything else I can do.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle. Changing version to '13'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 582894 ***