Bug 536143 (RHQ-525) - write generic framework for executing abstract services concurrently, but which respects service dependencies
Summary: write generic framework for executing abstract services concurrently, but whi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: RHQ-525
Product: RHQ Project
Classification: Other
Component: Performance
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Joseph Marques
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RH...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: RHQ-526
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-05-29 16:24 UTC by Joseph Marques
Modified: 2009-11-10 21:22 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: 1.0.1
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Joseph Marques 2008-05-29 16:24:00 UTC
this is likely going to be a thin wrapper around latches from the java.util.concurrent lib, but which simplifies the programming interface for the developer that wants to enable conconcurrent, latched execution of services.

Comment 1 Joseph Marques 2008-05-29 16:32:41 UTC
rev883 - controller framework for executing services concurrently which respects service dependencies; 
service dependencies need to be contructed properly by the calling context; 
handles errors by bubbling it up the dependency chain and won't attempt to execute services whose dependencies have already failed; 

Comment 2 Joseph Marques 2008-05-29 23:43:08 UTC
rev889 - add checked against circular dependencies amongst latched services; 
without this check, executeServices would have blocked forever since all services would block on their private dependencyLatch forever; 
all wrote test harness to make sure circular check works properly against all different sorts of dependency graphs, including self-circularities; 

Comment 3 Joseph Marques 2008-06-12 17:16:33 UTC
closing this code-level item, no qa necessary.

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2009-11-10 21:11:07 UTC
This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-525



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.