Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 546738
Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop
Last modified: 2012-04-18 17:05:52 EDT
Spec URL: http://bagu.org/scratch/accerciser.spec
SRPM URL: http://bagu.org/scratch/accerciser-1.9.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
Accerciser is an interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop. It uses AT-SPI to inspect and control widgets, allowing you to check if an application is providing correct information to assistive technologies and automated test frameworks.
Builds fine in mock.
accerciser.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgail-gnome
accerciser.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US assistive -> assistance, assisted, assistant
accerciser.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/accerciser/plugins/ipython_view.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
accerciser.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/accerciser.schemas
accerciser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US assistive -> assistance, assisted, assistant
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
In the rpmlint output, the non-executable-script warning should probably be fixed by removing the shebang line from the plugin.
package name: ok
spec file name: ok
- the rm -rf at the top of %install is no longer necessary
- %clean is no longer necessary
- the handling of the icon cache should be updated to follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
- the desktop file has no MimeType entry, so the update-desktop-database call is unnecessary
license field: ok
license file: ok
spec file language: ok
spec file readability: ok
upstream sources: ok
locale handling: ok
system libraries: ok
directory ownership: ok
duplicate files: ok
macro use: ok
permissable content: ok
large docs: ok
%doc content: ok
static libs: ok
shared libs: ok
devel package: ok
libtool archives: ok
- need to call desktop-file-validate on the installed desktop file
directory ownership: ok
utf8 filenames: ok
I no longer have time to maintain the accerciser package. Does somebody want to take over the package review? I would like to remove the spec file and sprm from my server. Is there a place I can put these files to in case somebody wants to take over this review sometime in the future? Thanks, Ben
You can put files on your fedorapeople account if you have one, or you could attach the spec file to this ticket. There don't seem to be any patches so it should be sufficient to recreate the package.
I copied the files from the initial post to my fedorapeople page:
Should I keep this bug open even though I'm not planning to continue the review or should should I close it?
I'll close it out for you. The ticket will of course stay around and be easy to find from the search box http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ among other places, should someone want to pick it back up in the future.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 813306 ***