Summary: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/vsftpd "net_raw" access. Detailed Description: SELinux denied access requested by vsftpd. It is not expected that this access is required by vsftpd and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access. Allowing Access: You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Please file a bug report. Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Context system_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Objects None [ capability ] Source vsftpd Source Path /usr/sbin/vsftpd Port <Unknown> Host (removed) Source RPM Packages vsftpd-2.2.0-6.fc12 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.6.32-59.fc12 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Plugin Name catchall Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.i686 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 11:14:59 EST 2009 i686 i686 Alert Count 1 First Seen Sat 26 Dec 2009 07:14:59 AM HST Last Seen Sat 26 Dec 2009 07:14:59 AM HST Local ID 43da2f59-ba74-459c-999f-3c45a60927b2 Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages node=(removed) type=AVC msg=audit(1261847699.396:26894): avc: denied { net_raw } for pid=6184 comm="vsftpd" capability=13 scontext=system_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=capability node=(removed) type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1261847699.396:26894): arch=40000003 syscall=120 success=no exit=-1 a0=40000011 a1=0 a2=b42338 a3=b42338 items=0 ppid=0 pid=6184 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="vsftpd" exe="/usr/sbin/vsftpd" subj=system_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) Hash String generated from selinux-policy-3.6.32-59.fc12,catchall,vsftpd,ftpd_t,ftpd_t,capability,net_raw audit2allow suggests: #============= ftpd_t ============== allow ftpd_t self:capability net_raw;
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 547339 ***