I have upload the files to fedorapeople also


Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pymilia.spec
SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pymilia-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

First same here, like in your milia package:

Sources do not match upstream (diff -r is empty), so what happend here?
1f9d6d2d4de2f14a90aa5762b5f67156  your sources
3b9d7aa9e4033ee945b879e9aee0525c  upstream url


Review:

Good:
- name ok
- license ok
- %clean there
- %install the python way
- %doc ok
- permissions ok
- no static libs
- rpmlint clean
- macros everywhere


TODO:
- changelog format:
  add a '- ' to the last line
- Are BR ok?
  This is a wrapper for milia so why shouldn't milia-devel >= %{version} be needed?
  It would be the sane way ;)
  python-setuptools is missing.


Waiting for the sources comment, till I'll approve this (There are no other blocker, not to do so...).

Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pymilia.spec
SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pymilia-0.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm

I have fixed the typo in the changelog and added python-setuptools. I have removed python-devel, because it's already required by milia-devel

The tarballs, again, only differ in the timestamp. It's fixed now

Are you sure the Fedora optimization flags are used in the build...? Normally one needs to pass e.g.

# Remove CFLAGS=... for noarch packages (unneeded)
CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{__python} setup.py build

as in the python spec file template.

I get the same flags with ot without CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", namely

-pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -fPIC

Where is this python spec template?

If you can rpmdev-newspec with a name that includes "py", it will automatically use the python template. To manually select python, run

  rpmdev-newspec -t python foo

rpmdev-newspec --help has more options and templates.

- Please add the CFLAGS as in the template.
  But because you use %{buildroot}, use %{optflags} instead $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
  (Thanks Jussi.)

- Add BR: python-devel again, please.
  Why is it required by milia-devel?
  Didn't you make two packages to avoid milia-devel requires python*?

  Another reason for adding this would be to not interfer with python3*.

Provides: libmilia.so.3()(64bit)
Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <=
4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgsl.so.0()(64bit)
libgslcblas.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libmilia.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Processing files: milia-devel-0.3.0-1.fc12.x86_64
Provides: pkgconfig(milia) = 0.3.0
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <=
4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies)
<= 3.0.3-1
Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libmilia.so.3()(64bit) pkgconfig(gsl)


Don't see a python* here.

Sorry if I'm missing something, but pymilia already depends in python-devel. 

BuildRequires: python-devel python-setuptools milia-devel >= %{version}

I've added the CFLAGS line

Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pymilia.spec
SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pymilia-0.3.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

(In reply to comment #8)
> Sorry if I'm missing something, but pymilia already depends in python-devel. 

Yes, it does in this case, because there is BR python-setuptools, but I believe this is no reason to always trust this and leave it out.
I'm unsure, if it's allowed to leave it you (Guidelines say should, so probably yes), but adding is definately the saner way ;)


The new dependency (milia) is already approved.


##########################

APPROVED

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: pymilia
Short Description: Python wrappers for milia
Owners: sergiopr
Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5
InitialCC:

The requested package name (pymilia) doesn't match the package name in the bug
summary (Pymilia).  Please verify that the lower case version is correct, and
edit the bug summary if so.

Lower case is correct, fixed in the summary

CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

Build in rawhide:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=153248