Bug 563444 - Review Request: Anumaan - A predictive text entry system
Review Request: Anumaan - A predictive text entry system
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-02-10 04:25 EST by Naveen Kumar
Modified: 2010-11-19 07:24 EST (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-19 04:13:49 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Naveen Kumar 2010-02-10 04:25:16 EST
Spec URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/anumaan/AnumaanLinux-alpha.spec
SRPM URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/anumaan/AnumaanLinux-alpha-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: 
Hi! I have just finished packaging Anumaan, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get into fedora.

Anumaan is especially designed for people, suffering from Motor disability.
Comment 1 Naveen Kumar 2010-02-10 05:53:26 EST
Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1973706
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 01:39:42 EST
Maybe the package should just be called AnumaanLinux or even
Anumaan? if alpha means alpha release?  (I think the upstream
naming scheme is not ideal but anyway.)
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 01:41:51 EST
AnumaanDefaultLM can't be packaged itself?
Comment 4 Naveen Kumar 2010-02-11 01:52:53 EST
Ok I will change the name to Anumaan and split AnumaanDefaultLM from it, and then resubmit.
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 02:18:40 EST
Any chance of fixing the upstream tarball rather
than having all the chmod's in the spec file?

Similarly better if Anumaan.sh became Anumaan.

But I guess these are not blockers.
Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 02:19:21 EST
(Anyway just some initial comments and impressions. :)
Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 02:20:52 EST
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ok I will change the name to Anumaan and split AnumaanDefaultLM from it, and
> then resubmit.    

To be clear - you can update the submission and summary here
(no need to open a new review.)
Comment 8 Naveen Kumar 2010-02-11 07:45:41 EST
(In reply to comment #5)
> Any chance of fixing the upstream tarball rather
> than having all the chmod's in the spec file?
> 
Nope, I do have rights on CDAC Mumbai site now.

> Similarly better if Anumaan.sh became Anumaan.
> 
> But I guess these are not blockers.    

Done.
Comment 12 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-02-25 23:33:23 EST
Naveen,
   I have sponsored you now. Hope to see you you will continue reviewing packages and adding few more packages in Fedora.
Welcome to Packager group.

   I am not familiar with Java packaging much but if someone can help you to complete this review then it will be good or then I will review this.

Also, make sure bump the release whenever you submit new updated srpm.
Comment 13 Naveen Kumar 2010-03-05 05:07:09 EST
Thanks :)

regards
Naveen
Comment 14 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-17 17:42:50 EST
Both URLs in comment 11 are invalid.
Comment 15 Naveen Kumar 2010-11-19 04:13:49 EST
Closing this request, I will later make a new request with new enhancements on this application.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.