Bug 563444 - Review Request: Anumaan - A predictive text entry system
Summary: Review Request: Anumaan - A predictive text entry system
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-02-10 09:25 UTC by Naveen Kumar
Modified: 2010-11-19 12:24 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-19 09:13:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Naveen Kumar 2010-02-10 09:25:16 UTC
Spec URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/anumaan/AnumaanLinux-alpha.spec
SRPM URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/anumaan/AnumaanLinux-alpha-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: 
Hi! I have just finished packaging Anumaan, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get into fedora.

Anumaan is especially designed for people, suffering from Motor disability.

Comment 1 Naveen Kumar 2010-02-10 10:53:26 UTC
Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1973706

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 06:39:42 UTC
Maybe the package should just be called AnumaanLinux or even
Anumaan? if alpha means alpha release?  (I think the upstream
naming scheme is not ideal but anyway.)

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 06:41:51 UTC
AnumaanDefaultLM can't be packaged itself?

Comment 4 Naveen Kumar 2010-02-11 06:52:53 UTC
Ok I will change the name to Anumaan and split AnumaanDefaultLM from it, and then resubmit.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 07:18:40 UTC
Any chance of fixing the upstream tarball rather
than having all the chmod's in the spec file?

Similarly better if Anumaan.sh became Anumaan.

But I guess these are not blockers.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 07:19:21 UTC
(Anyway just some initial comments and impressions. :)

Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 07:20:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ok I will change the name to Anumaan and split AnumaanDefaultLM from it, and
> then resubmit.    

To be clear - you can update the submission and summary here
(no need to open a new review.)

Comment 8 Naveen Kumar 2010-02-11 12:45:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Any chance of fixing the upstream tarball rather
> than having all the chmod's in the spec file?
> 
Nope, I do have rights on CDAC Mumbai site now.

> Similarly better if Anumaan.sh became Anumaan.
> 
> But I guess these are not blockers.    

Done.

Comment 12 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-02-26 04:33:23 UTC
Naveen,
   I have sponsored you now. Hope to see you you will continue reviewing packages and adding few more packages in Fedora.
Welcome to Packager group.

   I am not familiar with Java packaging much but if someone can help you to complete this review then it will be good or then I will review this.

Also, make sure bump the release whenever you submit new updated srpm.

Comment 13 Naveen Kumar 2010-03-05 10:07:09 UTC
Thanks :)

regards
Naveen

Comment 14 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-17 22:42:50 UTC
Both URLs in comment 11 are invalid.

Comment 15 Naveen Kumar 2010-11-19 09:13:49 UTC
Closing this request, I will later make a new request with new enhancements on this application.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.