Bug 564767 - FTBFS gshutdown-0.2-6.fc12: ImplicitDSOLinking
Summary: FTBFS gshutdown-0.2-6.fc12: ImplicitDSOLinking
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 599784
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gshutdown
Version: 13
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Xavier Lamien
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/Fi...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 564245 583274
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-02-13 16:51 UTC by FTBFS
Modified: 2011-04-07 09:37 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-04-07 09:37:58 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
root.log (454.18 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:51 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log (20.06 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:51 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
mock.log (952 bytes, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:51 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
root.log (658.72 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:51 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
build.log (19.43 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:51 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
mock.log (961 bytes, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:51 UTC, FTBFS
no flags Details
gshutdown (303 bytes, text/plain)
2010-05-12 19:06 UTC, Charley Wang
no flags Details

Description FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:22 UTC
gshutdown-0.2-6.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
This failure is due to a change in the linker default behavior, which uncovered a fault in your package.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking .
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug.  Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug.  If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one.  Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies.  (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.  Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)

Comment 1 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:25 UTC
Created attachment 391613 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386

Comment 2 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:26 UTC
Created attachment 391614 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386

Comment 3 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:27 UTC
Created attachment 391615 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386

Comment 4 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:29 UTC
Created attachment 391616 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64

Comment 5 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:30 UTC
Created attachment 391617 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64

Comment 6 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:51:33 UTC
Created attachment 391618 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64

Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2010-03-15 14:40:44 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle.
Changing version to '13'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 8 Charley Wang 2010-05-12 19:06:18 UTC
Created attachment 413525 [details]
gshutdown

Hi,

I made a quick patch that fixes the ld error in gshutdown. It uses AC_CHECK_LIB which can be inefficient but will get this package building again.

If nobody objects, I can find someone to do a direct commit of this fix so that gshutdown will work in F-13.

-Charley

Comment 9 Xavier Lamien 2010-05-12 19:16:22 UTC
I will take care of this tomorrow.
Thanks for having taken time to do the patch.

Comment 10 Xavier Lamien 2010-05-13 14:46:23 UTC
Alright,
Added your patch however, was missing, the X linkers.
new release is on its way.

Comment 11 Charley Wang 2010-05-20 15:01:02 UTC
Thanks for taking a look! I don't see the new release in fedora-cvs yet, will test a rebuild when I do.

Thanks,

-Charley

Comment 12 Xavier Lamien 2010-06-15 09:28:04 UTC
yep, having some cvs issue which will be fix soonish.

Comment 13 Jan Klepek 2011-03-13 11:57:39 UTC
Hi,

Was this issue fixed and package pushed into testing/stable?

Comment 14 Caolan McNamara 2011-04-07 09:37:58 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 599784 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.