+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #539740 +++ Description of problem: iptraf does not list the ethernet nic (eth0 in my case). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. su - 2. iptraf 3. ip traffic monitor Actual results: Lists All interfaces lo Expected results: All interfaces eth0 lo Additional info: Just discovered that it does not list my wifi nic either. --- Additional comment from guillermo.gomez on 2009-12-10 09:03:15 EST --- same results, the nic is up and configured. it also happens with wlan0. ip traffic monitor i mean > run iptraf, select ip traffic monitor (m), select interface (list appears, does not show eth0 nor wlan0) [root@movix ~]# uname -r 2.6.31.6-145.fc12.x86_64 [root@movix ~]# rpm -q iptraf iptraf-3.0.1-8.fc12.x86_64 [root@movix ~]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:38:72:A6:06 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:18 noticed its just a listing problem, when packets goes through the interface, iptraf shows the name of the interface correctly (eth0, wlan0). --- Additional comment from guillermo.gomez on 2010-03-14 16:44:23 EDT --- No news, still same behaviour: [gomix@movix ~]$ uname -r 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 [gomix@movix ~]$ iptraf -v IPTraf Version 3.0.1 Copyright (c) Gerard Paul Java 1997-2004 Created an attachment (id=400824) 0001-fix-strcpy-overlap-memory.patch I have a good news everyone. I found a problem in source code why is not NIC listed. Thanks to Jan. Patch is attached if you want to look and here you have a build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2059230 --- Additional comment from mishu on 2010-03-22 10:40:56 EDT --- With iptraf-3.0.1-10.fc12 I could see now all network interfaces: eth0, wlan0, lo etc. So bug is fixed. Many thanks! --- Additional comment from guillermo.gomez on 2010-03-22 19:02:53 EDT --- Confirmed, the bug is fixed in my F12 x86_64 , :D
Created attachment 401978 [details] 0001-fix-strcpy-overlap-memory.patch
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was erroneously denied for the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The error has been fixed and this request has been re-proposed for the current release.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This bug/component is not included in scope for RHEL-5.11.0 which is the last RHEL5 minor release. This Bugzilla will soon be CLOSED as WONTFIX (at the end of RHEL5.11 development phase (Apr 22, 2014)). Please contact your account manager or support representative in case you need to escalate this bug.
Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in RHEL5 stream. If the issue is critical for your business, please provide additional business justification through the appropriate support channels (https://access.redhat.com/site/support).
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days