Bug 580744 - Review Request: dsh - Run a single command on many hosts.
Summary: Review Request: dsh - Run a single command on many hosts.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 580681
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-04-08 22:46 UTC by Damien Durand
Modified: 2010-09-14 10:55 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-09-14 10:55:29 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Damien Durand 2010-04-08 22:46:21 UTC
Spec URL: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/dsh/dsh.spec
SRPM URL: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/dsh/dsh-0.25.9-4.src.rpm

Description: Distributed shell. Runs command through rsh or ssh on a cluster of
machines.


libdshconfig is needed to build this package, there is a review here : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580681

Comment 1 Martin Gieseking 2010-04-09 12:36:25 UTC
Hi Damien,

here are a couple of initial comments:

- the above SPEC and SRPM are out of sync (spec files differ)

- change %{?disttag} to %{?dist} in the Release field

- The tarball contains a copy of gettext. You should remove it and use the correspondent Fedora package instead. Some additional patching might be necessary.

- The tarball contains several tests. It's probably a good idea to run them (in a %check section).

- The changelog seems to be incomplete. Some releases are not listed, e.g. 0.25.9-1, -2, -3.

- The header format of the changelog entries should be consistent.

Comment 2 Martin Gieseking 2010-04-09 12:50:44 UTC
Another cosmetic issue:
- delete the final dot from the summary

$ rpmlint dsh-*
dsh.i686: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Run a single command on many hosts.
dsh.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rsh -> rah, rs, sh
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Comment 3 Martin Gieseking 2010-08-31 15:02:52 UTC
Damien, what's the status of this package?

Comment 4 Damien Durand 2010-09-14 10:55:29 UTC
Hello

I'm closing this review... I don't work on this package.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.