Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 58539 - Can's start it
Can's start it
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 54319
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: apacheconf (Show other bugs)
7.2
noarch Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jonathan Blandford
Brian Brock
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2002-01-18 19:39 EST by Need Real Name
Modified: 2013-04-02 00:15 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-01-24 07:56:03 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Need Real Name 2002-01-18 19:39:21 EST 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-13 i586; Nav)

Description of problem:
I installed
apacheconf and all the packages what it needs. When I try to start it
says:

[root@xxx root]# apacheconf
Traceback (innermost last):
  File "/usr/share/apacheconf/ApacheConf.py", line 36, in ?
    import ApacheGizmo
  File "/usr/share/apacheconf/ApacheGizmo.py", line 36, in ?
    import ApacheBase
  File "/usr/share/apacheconf/ApacheBase.py", line 9, in ?
    from xml.xslt.Processor import Processor
ImportError: No module named xml.xslt.Processor [root@xxx root]#

I tryed on two computers this tool but the error is the same.
I think it could be dependency problems, i dunno.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install apache and apacheconf
2.Start it
3. It will fail

	

Additional info:
Comment 1 Phil Knirsch 2002-01-24 07:57:20 EST 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 54319 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.