Bug 586763 - wrong ne.orth
Summary: wrong ne.orth
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fontconfig
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Akira TAGOH
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 586898
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-04-28 10:36 UTC by Akira TAGOH
Modified: 2012-06-11 12:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: fontconfig-2.9.91-1.fc18
Clone Of:
: 586898 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-11 12:18:54 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
FreeDesktop.org 24729 0 None None None Never

Description Akira TAGOH 2010-04-28 10:36:00 UTC 
Description of problem:
madan-fonts is supposed to work for Nepali font though, it doesn't have enough glyph coverage in fontconfig.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
madan-fonts-2.000-2.fc13.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.fc-match -v "Madan"|grep -E "        lang"|grep ne
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
No output

Expected results:
the lang spec should contains ne.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2010-04-28 10:36:36 UTC 
This is raised during the testing of Bug#578041.
Comment 2 Parag Nemade 2010-05-20 06:53:29 UTC 
This is because of fontconfig ne.orth issue. This problem is already reported
in upstream https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24729

So we are waiting for long in upstream but no fixes yet.
Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 11:29:40 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 4 Parag Nemade 2011-11-10 05:09:24 UTC 
ping behdad

moving this to F16
Comment 5 Behdad Esfahbod 2011-11-10 14:41:33 UTC 
I'm not involved in Fedora anymore.
Comment 6 Akira TAGOH 2011-11-11 01:43:26 UTC 
guess Parag was asking because you are still the owner of the fontconfig package in Fedora :)
Comment 7 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2012-01-10 15:42:34 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 8 Pravin Satpute 2012-02-14 15:12:52 UTC 
- This is resolved in upstream but nothing yet in Fedora.

- This is part of Fedora 17 feature
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Additional_Indic_Langs
Comment 9 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2012-03-22 01:38:01 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-03-23 06:58:11 UTC 
fontconfig-2.8.0-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontconfig-2.8.0-6.fc17
Comment 11 Pravin Satpute 2012-03-29 10:19:23 UTC 
still present.
Comment 12 Akira TAGOH 2012-03-29 11:48:25 UTC 
(In reply to comment #11)
> still present.

Does that mean you can also still see this problem on even 2.9.0?
Comment 13 Pravin Satpute 2012-03-29 12:23:46 UTC 
Yes, sorry i have not written much here. Have written more detail on upstream bug id http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24729 submitted latest patch there as well.

Actually parag's patch never got committed in uptream.

This bug not affecting "Additional language" feature, so its fine if it takes more time.
Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2012-04-12 02:16:20 UTC 
fontconfig-2.8.0-6.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 15 Akira TAGOH 2012-06-11 12:18:54 UTC 
should be fixed in fontconfig-2.9.91-1.fc18
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.