Bug 587593 – [abrt] crash in anjuta-1:2.28.2.0-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/anjuta was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bug 587593 - [abrt] crash in anjuta-1:2.28.2.0-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/anjuta was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in anjuta-1:2.28.2.0-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/anjuta was killed ...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 585677

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	anjuta (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Debarshi Ray
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:165e78b4f4193ddbfd52fa23f47...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-04-30 06:29 EDT by adriano
Modified:	2010-05-25 05:01 EDT (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:01:28 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (19.90 KB, text/plain) 2010-04-30 06:29 EDT, adriano	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description adriano 2010-04-30 06:29:42 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: anjuta
component: anjuta
executable: /usr/bin/anjuta
global_uuid: 165e78b4f4193ddbfd52fa23f4748d22b68749a0
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686
package: anjuta-1:2.28.2.0-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/anjuta was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

comment
-----
Open anjuta
Click "new file" icon
crash!

Comment 1 adriano 2010-04-30 06:29:47 EDT

Created attachment 410365 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:01:28 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 585677 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:01:28 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #585677.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.