Bug 589384 - [abrt] crash in gvfs-1.6.1-3.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gvfs-1.6.1-3.fc13: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfs-gdu-volum...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 579724
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:71137669c0a9f34828a8e8c610e...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-06 02:28 UTC by Robert Hancock
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:47 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:23:24 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (9.56 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-06 02:28 UTC, Robert Hancock 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Robert Hancock 2010-05-06 02:28:17 UTC 
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor
component: gvfs
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor
global_uuid: 71137669c0a9f34828a8e8c610effff9f6ab3d40
kernel: 2.6.33.3-79.fc13.x86_64
package: gvfs-1.6.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Logged in
2.
3.
Comment 1 Robert Hancock 2010-05-06 02:28:19 UTC 
Created attachment 411789 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:23:24 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 579724 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:23:24 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #579724.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.