Hide Forgot
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #483071 +++ Description of problem: Attempting to apply the filesystem update for RHEL5.3 will fail when /home and/or /usr/local are NFS mounted. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): filesystem-2.4.0-2 How reproducible: always when NFS mounts exist Steps to Reproduce: 1. # yum -y update filesystem Running Transaction Updating : filesystem [1/2] Error unpacking rpm package filesystem-2.4.0-2.i386 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home: cpio: chown Updated: filesystem.i386 0:2.4.0-2 Complete! Actual results: Expected results: filesystem ignores the error for NFS mounted filesystems. thanks! daryl --- Additional comment from pknirsch@redhat.com on 2009-02-03 10:56:34 EST --- Are those /usr/local and/or /home mounted read-only and/or without no_root_squash? If they are that explains it as rpm will try and update the directory entries during an update of the filesystem component (see the chown error for /home where rpm tries to change the owner of /home). This problem can be worked around by either unmounting both directories prior to an update or by exporting them with the no_root_squash during the time of the update. Generally though this is something that needs to be fixed in rpm, so i'm reassigning this bug to the rpm component. Thanks & regards, Phil --- Additional comment from akrherz@iastate.edu on 2009-02-03 11:39:54 EST --- Hi, Thanks for the response and the work arounds are easy enough. I still think there is a bug here somewhere :) 1. Eventhough the filesystem rpm install fails, 2. yum will still report an update success 3. yum then updates RHN noting that the filesystem rpm was installed, when it actually wasn't... thanks! daryl --- Additional comment from pknirsch@redhat.com on 2009-02-11 08:14:14 EST --- *** Bug 484212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Additional comment from adam.winberg@smhi.se on 2009-02-11 08:23:05 EST --- i would not say those workarounds are satisfactory in a large production environment with strict security policies. I think i will wait for an update of the rpm wich resolves this instead, hope to see it soon. --- Additional comment from pmatilai@redhat.com on 2009-02-11 09:11:14 EST --- To have rpm semi-reasonably deal with NFS-mounts on rpm "owned" paths, you need to tell rpm about them. This'll tell rpm to avoid touching /home and /usr/local: # echo "%_netsharedpath /home:/usr/local" > /etc/rpm/macros.nfs That yum reports success on clearly failed packages is a yum bug (recently been addressed at yum upstream to some extent at least) --- Additional comment from akrherz@iastate.edu on 2009-02-11 12:21:16 EST --- Thanks Panu! I learn something everything day :) Should this be refiled to the yum component then? thanks! daryl --- Additional comment from pknirsch@redhat.com on 2009-03-03 08:37:30 EST --- *** Bug 488229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Additional comment from kyle@linuxdork.org on 2009-04-03 18:13:30 EDT --- This bug will also occur if the immutable flag is set on the root (/) directory. --- Additional comment from pmatilai@redhat.com on 2009-04-07 11:27:54 EDT --- *** Bug 489718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Additional comment from herrold@owlriver.com on 2009-04-29 12:03:17 EDT --- This problem continues in RawHide presently Updating : filesystem 2/583 Error unpacking rpm package filesystem-2.4.21-1.fc11.i586 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home: cpio: chown with a fstab thus: # nfs.first.lan:/home /home nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr 0 0 xps400.first.lan:/var/ftp/pub/mirror /mnt/nfs/var/ftp/pub/mirror nfs \ ro,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr 0 0 # and an export: [herrold@nfs ~]$ cat /etc/exports # # then: /usr/sbin/exportfs -ra # /home *.first.lan(rw) # [herrold@nfs ~]$ so the stock root_squash is (intentionally) in play at the remote NFS server -- Russ Herrold --- Additional comment from systems@reservoir.com on 2009-07-23 12:04:32 EDT --- I'm getting this bug on a Cell blade (QS22) running the PPC version for RHEL 5. $ sudo yum -y update Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security CellSDK-Open-RHEL-cbea | 1.1 kB 00:00 CellSDK-Extras-RHEL-cbea | 1.1 kB 00:00 CellSDK-Devel-RHEL-cbea | 1.1 kB 00:00 Skipping security plugin, no data Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies Skipping security plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package filesystem.ppc 0:2.4.0-2 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: filesystem ppc 2.4.0-2 rhel-ppc-server-5 116 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 0 Package(s) Update 1 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 116 k Downloading Packages: filesystem-2.4.0-2.ppc.rpm | 116 kB 00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Updating : filesystem [1/2] Error unpacking rpm package filesystem-2.4.0-2.ppc error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home: cpio: chown There was an error communicating with RHN. Package profile information could not be sent. Error communicating with server. The message was: Error Message: Unknown package arch found Error Class Code: 45 Error Class Info: Invalid architecture. The architecture of the package is not supported by Red Hat Network Explanation: An error has occurred while processing your request. If this problem persists please enter a bug report at bugzilla.redhat.com. If you choose to submit the bug report, please be sure to include details of what you were trying to do when this error occurred and details on how to reproduce this problem. Updated: filesystem.ppc 0:2.4.0-2 Complete! --- Additional comment from ffesti@redhat.com on 2009-09-23 06:01:14 EDT --- Basically the error message give here is right. Solution is setting netsharedpath to keep rpm out of the mount points. Of course it would be nicer if rpm could detect such situations before starting the transaction and error out. Adding such check to rpm is out of the scope of a RHEL update release and will be done upstream. --- Additional comment from herrold@owlriver.com on 2010-05-20 18:00:25 EDT --- This is Closed/Deferred in the parent but still not solved -- I see similarly #484212 #526368 but the issue is still present in RHEL 5 (.5 update) -- Russ herrold
Any approach to solving this issue?
This is still observed under 5.6 Any approach to solving this issue?
Well, setting %_netsharedpaths works now, in practically all existing rpm versions. Upstream recently started permitting chmod/chown failure in the case permissions on fs were already identical, which alleviates this issue in many common cases (depending on NFS-mount permissions of course). Backporting can be considered if/when rpm is next scheduled for an update.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Engineering for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Red Hat does not currently plan to provide this change in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux update release for currently deployed products. With the goal of minimizing risk of change for deployed systems, and in response to customer and partner requirements, Red Hat takes a conservative approach when evaluating enhancements for inclusion in maintenance updates for currently deployed products. The primary objectives of update releases are to enable new hardware platform support and to resolve critical defects. This issue should be fixed in the next major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release, for existing ones the solution is to use %_netsharedpath to exclude nfs-mounts and the like.