Bug 595785 - [abrt] crash in genesis-0.4.3-1.fc13: genesis.py:343:save_preference:AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'
Summary: [abrt] crash in genesis-0.4.3-1.fc13: genesis.py:343:save_preference:Attribut...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 588630
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: genesis
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrea Musuruane
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:9d9b7e37
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-25 15:35 UTC by John Margaritopoulos
Modified: 2010-05-30 19:04 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2010-05-30 19:04:12 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (499 bytes, text/plain)
2010-05-25 15:35 UTC, John Margaritopoulos 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description John Margaritopoulos 2010-05-25 15:35:21 UTC 
abrt 1.1.0 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
cmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/genesis
component: genesis
executable: /usr/bin/genesis
kernel: 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686
package: genesis-0.4.3-1.fc13
reason: genesis.py:343:save_preference:AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

backtrace
-----
genesis.py:343:save_preference:AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Genesis/genesis.py", line 343, in save_preference
    widget_type, name = widget.name.split('_', 1)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'

Local variables in innermost frame:
widget: <gtk.SpinButton object at 0x9afc5f4 (GtkSpinButton at 0x9c3c018)>
self: <Genesis.genesis.PreferencesDialog object at 0x9af5cec>
Comment 1 John Margaritopoulos 2010-05-25 15:35:23 UTC 
Created attachment 416440 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Andrea Musuruane 2010-05-25 15:48:23 UTC 
It seems to me that this is a duplicate of #588630 even though it happened in a different part of code. 

Can you please tell me how you reproduced this bug?
Comment 3 Andrea Musuruane 2010-05-30 19:04:12 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 588630 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.