Description of problem:
I yesterday upgraded and I'm now unable to log in to KDE using KDM. I can however log into Gnome of Failsafe mode.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa |grep kdm
# rpm -qa |grep kde
Steps to Reproduce:
1. upgrade to nighlty
3. in kdm choose KDE as your environment
screen blink and take me back to KDM
log in to KDE
Jun 1 09:14:50 dri kdm_greet: Cannot load /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/faces/.default.face: No such file or directory
Jun 1 09:15:09 dri kdm: X server for display :0 terminated unexpectedly
Jun 1 09:15:10 dri kdm_greet: Cannot load /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/faces/.default.face: No such file or directory
patterns pics programs themes
# yum whatprovides /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/faces
Loaded plugins: multithread, refresh-packagekit, rhsmplugin
brew/filelists_db | 3.3 kB 00:00
rhel6/filelists_db | 3.8 MB 00:00
rhel6-ap/filelists_db | 3.8 MB 00:00
rhts/filelists | 78 kB 00:00
No Matches found
X.Org X Server 1.7.7
Release Date: 2010-05-04
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: x86-004 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5
Current Operating System: Linux dri.englab.brq.redhat.com 2.6.32-31.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 27 18:26:27 EDT 2010 x86_64
Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-rhel6 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us quiet rhgb
Build Date: 30 May 2010 08:21:00PM
Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.7.7-3.el6
Current version of pixman: 0.16.6
Before reporting problems, check https://www.redhat.com/apps/support/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 1 09:14:48 2010
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
(II) [KMS] Kernel modesetting enabled.
(II) [KMS] Kernel modesetting enabled.
(EE) RADEON(1): reusing fd for second head
SELinux: Disabled on system, not enabling in X server
0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x28) [0x4696f8]
1: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x65819) [0x465819]
2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f6f749d8000+0xf440) [0x7f6f749e7440]
3: /usr/bin/X (xf86_reload_cursors+0x56) [0x51cd66]
4: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (0x7f6f712cc000+0xda872) [0x7f6f713a6872]
5: /usr/bin/X (xf86CrtcSetModeTransform+0x14c) [0x48374c]
6: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x11b088) [0x51b088]
7: /usr/bin/X (RRCrtcSet+0x99) [0x4a83e9]
8: /usr/bin/X (ProcRRSetScreenConfig+0x508) [0x559118]
9: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0xa6499) [0x4a6499]
10: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x35efc) [0x435efc]
11: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x21ffa) [0x421ffa]
12: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7f6f73629c5d]
13: /usr/bin/X (0x400000+0x21bb9) [0x421bb9]
Segmentation fault at address 0x4
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting
Please consult the Red Hat support
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
In /var/log/Xorg.0.log is the same backtrace. No usefull EE or WW message.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for
After more investigation I find this is not problem in kdm. Even if I start X manualy and run startkde it will throw this traceback and Xwindow segfault.
When I commented in xorg.conf line:
Option "SWcursor" "true"
I was able to login and this traceback do not appear again.
Rasigning to xorg-x11-drv-ati
Created attachment 418962 [details]
Can't reproduce it, please attach full Xorg log, also what is your GPU.
This issue has been proposed when we are only considering blocker
issues in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. It has
been denied for the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.
** If you would still like this issue considered for the current
release, ask your support representative to file as a blocker on
your behalf. Otherwise ask that it be considered for the next
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. **
I'm having the same problem: can't log in to KDE, exactly the same symptoms as noteded in the first two lines of the bug description.
The solution of comment #2 didn't work for me; setting SWcursor to true or false makes no difference.
Attaching: Xorg.log, syslog, kdm.log and abrt logs and dumps, including core.
Created attachment 434563 [details]
comment #8 xorg.log, syslog, kdm.log
Created attachment 434564 [details]
comment #8 abrt dumps
Created attachment 434565 [details]
comment #8 xorg.conf
Zenon you are facing a different issue, it seems that your having an issue with synaptics, please open a new bug against synaptic
(In reply to comment #12)
> Zenon you are facing a different issue, it seems that your having an issue with
> synaptics, please open a new bug against synaptic
It's not synaptics, but indeed it's not xorg-x11-drv-ati either. Moved to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618690 .
In meanwhile I upgraded to Fedora14. Therefore I'm unable to reproduce it on my machine.
Moving to 6.3
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
Yes. Dual screen. HW was ATI card, which I gave to tpelka.
(In reply to comment #31)
> Yes. Dual screen. HW was ATI card, which I gave to tpelka.
I can confirm I got the graphics.
Which ati ? :)
(In reply to comment #33)
> Which ati ? :)
Radeon X500 [RV380] PCIe.
Still can't reproduce is there a special kde configuration ? Like one screen rotated ?
Can you try if you still can trigger it with 6.4 nightly ?
I do not use RHEL6 on my workstation anymore. So I could not test it, sorry.
Tomas if you could test with 6.4 it would be nice.
(In reply to comment #40)
> Tomas if you could test with 6.4 it would be nice.
Jerome, sorry for my late response. I wasn't able to reproduce either.
I would be fine with close too.
Since this is not reproducing, I am closing it worksforme. If this problem reappears, please reopen this bz with detailed information on how it occurred. Thanks.