Bug 605840 - Review Request: Nini - An uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library
Summary: Review Request: Nini - An uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1000870
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 605847
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-06-18 22:26 UTC by Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz
Modified: 2013-11-24 00:03 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-15 20:03:28 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2010-06-18 22:26:28 UTC
Spec URL: <spec info here>
SRPM URL: <srpm info here>
Description: An uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library

FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Hi, I package Nini because is necessary to package Tangerine DAAP server

Errors and warnings whene run rpmlint:
Nini.spec:27: W: setup-not-quiet
Nini.src:27: W: setup-not-quiet

I need sponsor, this is my first package. If any speck spanish is my natural language to talk.

Thanks.

Comment 1 Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2010-06-18 22:31:57 UTC
Oh I forgot the links, sorry.

Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/Nini.spec
SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/Nini-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm

Thanks.

Comment 2 Tim Sally 2010-07-14 03:09:49 UTC
I'm currently working on another package that also requires Nini. It'd be great if someone could review this!

Comment 3 Steve Traylen 2010-12-15 19:43:30 UTC
The URL http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/Nini.spec
is not working,

In order to be sponsored can you do some informal reviews of some of
the packages here 

http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html

best to avoid the ones needing a sponsor , i.e the green ones.

Once you have done some reviews report back here links to your
reviews.

Steve.

Comment 4 Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2011-08-29 19:00:23 UTC
New spec revision

Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/nini.spec
SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nini-1.1.0-2.fc14.src.rpm

Comment 5 Paul P Komkoff Jr 2011-12-01 14:08:58 UTC
I've just accidentally submitted a review request for this without looking: 759139.
The spec file I have is substantially different from yours.
It's in here: http://stingray.fedorapeople.org/review/Nini/

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2013-11-24 00:03:45 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1000870 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.