Bug 614086 - [abrt] crash in evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13: io_error: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13: io_error: Process /usr/bin/evolution...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 627160
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:4ea39cd933f9ad3d6e0b26a8065...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-13 16:37 UTC by Damien Grassart
Modified: 2010-11-09 16:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 16:14:50 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (50.89 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-13 16:37 UTC, Damien Grassart 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Damien Grassart 2010-07-13 16:37:05 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
crash_function: io_error
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
global_uuid: 4ea39cd933f9ad3d6e0b26a8065824737dc51b1e
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Accepted a meeting requested, it froze up for a minute and eventually crashed.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Damien Grassart 2010-07-13 16:37:06 UTC 
Created attachment 431509 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:14:50 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 627160 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:14:50 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #627160.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.